Xenforo Feedback Thread

[Desmond]

Even my Quake Champions post was featured in the magazine.

 

[Æsoteric Positron]

^
Then why this forum isn't featured in the magazine? Weird. I remember years back when @Allu Azad post from the forum was printed in the digit magazine, everyone liked it here.
Is the telegram group that active or productive??
Or is it more like they want their presence in smartphone area but since they don't have dedicated app they went for Telegram group?

I think they were just giving the telegram group an initial boost. Its not digit who wants digit to have a smartphone presence, its the consumers I think, since people have been begging them to create a whatsapp group for years now.

To further add on advertisement of forum:
Below editors column, in a small area with heading "Discussions, links to interesting threads are given, but the posts are not printed, ". Below that are the links where you join the discussions -:
"Web: geek.digit.in | forum:geek.digit.in/community | Facebook: facebook.in/digitgeek".

The TG group is usually marketed as an easy way to give feedback on the mag, and I don't think interacting with the editors is so easy in TDF. So, thus the advertising of the telegram group is easily visible besides the feedback column, on the arguably the first page of the mag.

 

[Anorion]

Forum signatures should now support some extra stuff

Or we can replace this pic on the server too

*geek.digit.in/community/styles/default/xenforo/xenforo-logo.png

Will check this.
Uh can point it where that is not a problem. Need to find the logo first
Oh! so much talk about that logo lol. Removing it does this.

View attachment 20100

I really should not be the one asking this question, but... has anyone seen a "The Digit Forum" logo?

Here it is!

 

[Desmond]

I think you should use a PNG with transparent background. That way you can use the same logo for light as well as dark themes.

Currently I am using a greasemonkey script to add the Digit logo from the main site to the forum. It looks like this :

Dark:

Light:

This image is somewhat rough around the edges but I think this is better than nothing.

 

[Vyom]

Oh! so much talk about that logo lol. Removing it does this.

Removing does what? Not able to see attachment.

 

[RumbaMon19]

View attachment 20100

I liked the 404 page...

 

[Anorion]

Oh it shows a square icon of a PNG showing the image has to be there

 

[Æsoteric Positron]

I wonder if the 404 page was a metaphor....

 

[Æsoteric Positron]

Hey I know posting this could be potentially unhelpful and cringy, but I quite liked the theme in this forum The JoyFreak Community Thread , had to make sure it was infact xenforo based. Can we implement something like that in here?

 

[Anorion]

Yeah.
Feel free, don worry about anyone cringing or getting creeped lol.

 

[Anorion]

Dark mode by default? Yeah!

 

[Anorion]

Hope nothing is broken

 

[Anorion]

I think you should use a PNG with transparent background. That way you can use the same logo for light as well as dark themes.

Currently I am using a greasemonkey script to add the Digit logo from the main site to the forum. It looks like this :

Dark:

View attachment 20103

Light:

View attachment 20104

This image is somewhat rough around the edges but I think this is better than nothing.

This is sooo Digit lol. Tell me one good reason why we should change anything now

 

[Æsoteric Positron]

Dark mode by default? Yeah!

I didn't mean that, but now its implemented I love the difference it makes! I meant things their theme has, like better visible title in the threads

the mention of who is OP of the thread, toggle for light and dark theme etc. That's why I was afraid to post it, AFAIK these features could be hard to implement without the access to the theme ....

Hope nothing is broken

I wouldn't say broken, but, while this theme looks better than shades of grey, it makes certain elements hard to see, for example checkboxes and highlighted text. Maybe its just me though, do you also see the same problem?

 

[Desmond]

I didn't mean that, but now its implemented I love the difference it makes! I meant things their theme has, like better visible title in the threadsView attachment 20111the mention of who is OP of the thread, toggle for light and dark theme etc. That's why I was afraid to post it, AFAIK these features could be hard to implement without the access to the theme ....

I wouldn't say broken, but, while this theme looks better than shades of grey, it makes certain elements hard to see, for example checkboxes and highlighted text. Maybe its just me though, do you also see the same problem?
View attachment 20109 View attachment 20110

Have you tried the "Shades of blue" theme?

 

[Æsoteric Positron]

Have you tried the "Shades of blue" theme?

Nope, saw it,like shades of grey/default dark better.........

 

[Desmond]

shades of grey

Yeah, that. I typo'd the name. I find it easier to read than default dark.

 

[Æsoteric Positron]

Yeah, that. I typo'd the name. I find it easier to read than default dark.

Yup we both do

 

[Vyom]

Used photopea.com to modify the jpeg logo which I had in my archives and converted to png. Refer attached logos.

I also tried to attach PSD, so if anyone wants to use them to modify can do that, but forum don't allow that extension.

So get PSD here: digit_Logo

 

[Desmond]

DigitLogo_1.png has some white areas near the borders of the characters when viewed with dark background.

Rest look good