gameranand
Living to Play
With or without the HD pack and DX11 ??
Will this game run on this configuration?
- Thread starter GameAddict
- Start date
-
- Tags
- configuration game max playability run
With or without the HD pack and DX11 ??
For 1024*768
I've played Crysis 1 on the lowest settings long time back on Nvidia 7200/7300. (Thats is a really bad GPU)
I don't think Crysis 2 will playable on anything less than 8800gt.
So like Nerevarine said C2 at low settings (With or without the HD pack and DX11 ) is heavier than C1 at low settings
lol, tough to believe that.
Must have been really painful still.Here. I found an old screenshot.
This screenshot has a really low fps due to the explosion but from what I remember, the fps was around 20 normally & it didn't feel that slow.
*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/attachment.php?attachmentid=11185&d=1372870568
Attachments
gameranand
Living to Play
For me C1 and Warhead were heavier than C2.
avinandan012
Cyborg Agent
those were original the "Maximum Game"
Nerevarine
Incarnate
yup, my temperatures reach 75C when I play C1.. but it stays below 70 in C2
gameranand
Living to Play
Actually Temps depends on a lot of factors also like ambient temperature, weather conditions etc. Defining factor whether a game is resource hungry or not is fps.
gameranand
Living to Play
True FPS should be the measurement of game performance but some games really won't heat up your GPU like Railworks 2
Even if it reaches full GPU Load ??
nikufellow
In the zone
Will most modern games modern atleast start howsoever low the fps is on a lappy with i3 3110m (hd4000)?
gameranand
Living to Play
Yes they will except for some whose minimum requirement won't meet with your system.
it never reached full gpu load at-least at 1920*1080 with every graphic settings maxed out.
gameranand
Living to Play
Then how can it increase or decrease the temp. If GPU load is above 90 then temps really rises.
RW2 is not really a resource hungry game - gpu and cpu both and I've never seen the game using more than 65% gpu load so it keeps everything very cool though everything chnages starting from RW3 though - it's a real resource hogger for the added graphic details and looks.
sainath
Android Addicted
Hi, I'm casual gamer. I just upgraded my system with Gigabyte H61-DS2 MB & Intel G2020 processor. I already have ATI Radeon HD5450 DDR3 1GB graphics card. But I want to know that can I able to handle some old games (GTA 4, Crysis Warhead, etc) in low-middle settings with Intel onboard gpu i.e. Intel HD 4000 which has only 64mb dedicated graphics as I know. So I need to install my Radeon HD 5450 graphics card? Is Intel HD 4000 onboard shared memory is better than Radeon HD 5450 in terms of gaming? I got 6.1 ratings for gaming on Intel HD 4000 & 5.9 rating for gaming on ATI Radeon HD 5450.
Intel HD4000 is better than HD5450 but Intel G2020 has only "Intel HD Graphics" which is slower than ( worse performer ) even a HD5450 - your only option for playable FPS is to run the games with lowest settings and details possible. BTW, you can increse shared VGA ram from 64 Mb to 256/384/512MB using bios option.
gameranand
Living to Play
nikufellow
In the zone
What minimum fps do you guys consider as playable 40?(60?). I raised a similar question in other forum and some people answered even 120fps making me feel ashamed for i was happy with anything close to or above 30
making me feel ashamed for i was happy with anything close to or above 30