OP
gopi_vbboy
Cyborg Agent
and vi suck in kde...
wtfand vi suck in kde...
and vi suck in kde...
Every linux user worth his salt knows about the beauty of Arch. Perfect example of OSS freedom.Well, after using KDE in Arch, I have never bothered looking back to GNOME. Choice of my DE depends upon on the distro I am using. If I'll use Fedora or Ubuntu, I know that I will have to stick with GNOME. Whereas while on Mandriva, I prefer KDE. I am comfortable with both, but my preference is KDE + Arch.
i mean the gui one
Well, after using KDE in Arch, I have never bothered looking back to GNOME. Choice of my DE depends upon on the distro I am using. If I'll use Fedora or Ubuntu, I know that I will have to stick with GNOME. Whereas while on Mandriva, I prefer KDE. I am comfortable with both, but my preference is KDE + Arch.
Every linux user worth his salt knows about the beauty of Arch. Perfect example of OSS freedom.
I just wish that the installation procedure wouldn't have consumed that much work. But I guess its the reason the distro is also quite efficient. I might try installing Arch again like old times for giggles if I can scrounge the time.Yeah, freedom to have your system as you want without bloats.
I think you want to talk about something else?i mean the gui one
I just wish that the installation procedure wouldn't have consumed that much work. But I guess its the reason the distro is also quite efficient. I might try installing Arch again like old times for giggles if I can scrounge the time.
I actually don't think that installation of Arch consumes much work. The downloading of packages later consumes time rather.
The trick is to have a disk label for / and specify that in the grub line: root=/dev/disk/by-label/FOOWell heres the thing. Ive never had a problem with Arch on a system with a single hard DIsk. But now most systems I have access to have at least 2 . Each time I install Arch I run into disk related problems where I end up at a prompt like ramfs . And I cant find anything kind of help that sounds like something that a new person could do to fix the same.
From my experience is if you manage tog et it to run then yes Arch is very good when it comes to performance. However if you are running into an installation problem like I am right now then you are in for one hell of a nightmare.
Ill give that a try when I get some time.The trick is to have a disk label for / and specify that in the grub line: root=/dev/disk/by-label/FOO
It works irrespective of your IDE/SATA config, etc.
hehe, ROFL^^rtfm ......