OP
gopi_vbboy
Cyborg Agent
and vi suck in kde...
Liverpool_fan
Sami Hyypiä, LFC legend
wtf
How can the vi text editor, which is a command line text editor suck in KDE?
wtf indeed
Well, after using KDE in Arch, I have never bothered looking back to GNOME. Choice of my DE depends upon on the distro I am using. If I'll use Fedora or Ubuntu, I know that I will have to stick with GNOME. Whereas while on Mandriva, I prefer KDE. I am comfortable with both, but my preference is KDE + Arch.
Last edited:
OP
gopi_vbboy
Cyborg Agent
i mean the gui one
nileshgr
Wise Old Owl
Yeah the GUI vim (gvim) sucks irrespective of DE
I never use it, I prefer the command line one
True ! Arch+KDE is something different
Yeah, freedom to have your system as you want without bloats.
FilledVoid
Who stole my Alpaca!
I just wish that the installation procedure wouldn't have consumed that much work. But I guess its the reason the distro is also quite efficient. I might try installing Arch again like old times for giggles if I can scrounge the time.
I actually don't think that installation of Arch consumes much work. The downloading of packages later consumes time rather.
---------- Post added at 03:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:08 AM ----------
---------- Post added at 03:08 AM ---------- Previous post was at 03:08 AM ----------
I think you want to talk about something else?
nileshgr
Wise Old Owl
I don't think it consumes too much work ?
I had recently installed Arch on my friend's box, not much work though.
I actually don't think that installation of Arch consumes much work. The downloading of packages later consumes time rather.
True, but the things have improved. They have changed the package formats to .tar.xz from the old .tar.gz which reduces the package sizes like anything.
OP
gopi_vbboy
Cyborg Agent
ya arch +kde i was having full kde power seen on my acer 5738 lappy
but i had nightmares with fedora-kde ,suse-kde on pc's n even freinds pc it never even boots
gnome never gave me probs till now be it booting,acpi,graphics,mouting...well some depend on distro but kde was a like making a distro uncertaining of working 100%
but i had nightmares with fedora-kde ,suse-kde on pc's n even freinds pc it never even boots
gnome never gave me probs till now be it booting,acpi,graphics,mouting...well some depend on distro but kde was a like making a distro uncertaining of working 100%
OP
gopi_vbboy
Cyborg Agent
^^ wat do u mean?
FilledVoid
Who stole my Alpaca!
Well heres the thing. Ive never had a problem with Arch on a system with a single hard DIsk. But now most systems I have access to have at least 2 
. Each time I install Arch I run into disk related problems where I end up at a prompt like ramfs . And I cant find anything kind of help that sounds like something that a new person could do to fix the same.
From my experience is if you manage tog et it to run then yes Arch is very good when it comes to performance. However if you are running into an installation problem like I am right now then you are in for one hell of a nightmare.
. Each time I install Arch I run into disk related problems where I end up at a prompt like ramfs . And I cant find anything kind of help that sounds like something that a new person could do to fix the same. From my experience is if you manage tog et it to run then yes Arch is very good when it comes to performance. However if you are running into an installation problem like I am right now then you are in for one hell of a nightmare.
OP
gopi_vbboy
Cyborg Agent
^^arch bang is good....i read abt it in lfy 2day...sad my dvd is damaged...i couldnt try kubuntu or lucid
nileshgr
Wise Old Owl
The trick is to have a disk label for / and specify that in the grub line: root=/dev/disk/by-label/FOOWell heres the thing. Ive never had a problem with Arch on a system with a single hard DIsk. But now most systems I have access to have at least 2
From my experience is if you manage tog et it to run then yes Arch is very good when it comes to performance. However if you are running into an installation problem like I am right now then you are in for one hell of a nightmare.
It works irrespective of your IDE/SATA config, etc.
FilledVoid
Who stole my Alpaca!
Ill give that a try when I get some time.
OP
gopi_vbboy
Cyborg Agent
^^rtfm ......
nileshgr
Wise Old Owl
hehe, ROFL
Gauravs90
geek........
I'm noob in linux, i installed ubuntu with gnome and later on installed KDE desktop environment. After booting in KDE it looked better then gnome but after sometime fooling around i realised i liked gnome better.
I geep getting lost in KDE and accidentally removed desktop activity and all my desktop tool gone!
I logged back in gnome and tried to remove it but not able to remove it then i have to format and reinstall ubuntu
I geep getting lost in KDE and accidentally removed desktop activity and all my desktop tool gone!
I logged back in gnome and tried to remove it but not able to remove it then i have to format and reinstall ubuntu