*crave.cnet.co.uk/gadgets/0,39029552,49293700-10,00.htmWindows Vista
Any operating system that provokes a campaign for its predecessor's reintroduction deserves to be classed as terrible technology. Any operating system that quietly has a downgrade-to- previous-edition option introduced for PC makers deserves to be classed as terrible technology. Any operating system that takes six years of development but is instantly hated by hordes of PC professionals and enthusiasts deserves to be classed as terrible technology.
Windows Vista conforms to all of the above. Its incompatibility with hardware, its obsessive requirement of human interaction to clear security dialogue box warnings and its abusive use of hated DRM, not to mention its general pointlessness as an upgrade, are just some examples of why this expensive operating system earns the final place in our terrible tech list.
My badCharan said:Actually Vista is in the 10th place and not the top
I agree!rayraven said:This is a biased review.
I dont agree with this.
Vista shud be at 1.
Regards,
ray
kalpik said:My bad
I agree!
But guys.. Lemme be absolutely crystal clear on one thing! If iMav posts anything here, i would just HAVE to agree with him
I'm sure that this'll be a problem for quuite some time to come, until vista becomes more stable, probably until SP1 releases..incompatibility with hardware
Frankly, I'm least bothered about DRM.. and I'm sure not many would be.its abusive use of hated DRM