just goes to show the desparation that u anti-MS guys will go to show Vista and anything MS in bad light .... intel not releasing drivers for vista is MS's faultYES, YES, YES, It's Microsoft's fault! What makes you think otherwise?
just goes to show the desparation that u anti-MS guys will go to show Vista and anything MS in bad light .... intel not releasing drivers for vista is MS's fault
YES, YES, YES, It's Microsoft's fault! What makes you think otherwise?
portraying Vista as something so great and capable of doing everything in the world when M$ very well knew it cannot is MICROSOFT's fault!
Lolz...desperation at the max.
So yeah, we can do whatever we want using Windows Vista.
All done guys? If there is more to say just put a note in the post, I got a better section for this supposedly news topic.
Vista Runs fine on my machine,looks good coz GUI is very cool but a bit user-unfriendly with many yes or no dialog boxes.I find Vista to be Gr8 if it stops giving BSOD's due to 4 gig RAM.I have to remove a 2GB stick b4 installing vista which causes me to tear my hair off!!
i also causes crashes at installationi'm running Vista since it has RTM'ed.and since then i've had only 2 BSOD.and with XP i had lots.i've never looked back to XP for all my computer needs.never had any driver issue,watever was needed was downloaded from Windows Update.
now if some1 installs vista on incompatible hardware and cries foul then is it MS' fault??
why dont u use Vsiat x64 if u use 4GB ram.even i use Vista 64-bit on my pc and 32bit on my lappy.
i also causes crashes at installation
2GB is enuf. for running vista IMO
Statements of Windows fanboys that we are supposed to make head or tail out of:
despite of betas if people cant release appropriate drivers then its not MS to be blamed MS1. Microsoft makes the software, others make the hardware. It is not Microsoft's fault if the hardware guys don't have appropriate support for the software.
free advise that can be ignored: stick to ur mac world2. It is, however, Linux OS' fault if it isn't appropriately supported by the hardware.
no 1 has blamed linux for, the reason why linux doesnt have drivers is because its just not considered worth wasting time upon
i find no reason why apple cannot come up with a legal version of os x that would work on pc the reason why it does not is because it knows the hardware vendors do not have the capability to keep in sync with software development3. Apple should sell the software without bundling it with the hardware because as you can see in the first point, that model works so very well.
@cyrus: sir nothing but just thank u the forums were becoming boring
1. Only reason there are no drivers for Vi$ta is that its just rushed. They brought it too quickly into the market.Statements of Windows fanboys that we are supposed to make head or tail out of:
despite of betas if people cant release appropriate drivers then its not MS to be blamed MS
free advise that can be ignored: stick to ur mac world
no 1 has blamed linux for, the reason why linux doesnt have drivers is because its just not considered worth wasting time upon
i find no reason why apple cannot come up with a legal version of os x that would work on pc the reason why it does not is because it knows the hardware vendors do not have the capability to keep in sync with software development
@cyrus: sir nothing but just thank u the forums were becoming boring
2. keep your Pi$$ta to yourself but leave linux alone. Its far too superior, and thanks to the potential it has, there are tonnes and tonnes of developers working on making it compatible with every hardware. Infact, companies like AMD are being forced to concider linux, as its the only way they can remain alive in the market.
3. If mac is released for PC, the sales of Macintosh PCs will drop by over 80%, as nobody will need to buy expensive computers anymore to run a few apps. So its not a logical move for apple to release a version of Macintosh OS for the PC. Doing so will be like suicide.
where's the hardware which this conversation is all about?
despite of betas if people cant release appropriate drivers then its not MS to be blamed MS
1. Only reason there are no drivers for Vi$ta is that its just rushed. They brought it too quickly into the market.
keep your a$$holePi$$ta to yourself but leave linux alone
And why should they, when there is hardly any potential for the OS that has been proved ?Longhorn beta was given to developers in year 2003, they had lots of time to make drivers.
Linux is my Hobby.Post reported, why do u get irked if someone blames Linux? Is Linux your GF or Wife???