THE graphics cards LIST

Status
Not open for further replies.
G

gxsaurav

Guest
Look again in my previous posts, I never said I went for FX due to speed, but due to Features

FX is good in OpenGL, animation is all OpenGL so FX beatsn Radeon in animation, it is beating rite now too
 

blade_runner

Cyborg Agent
gxsaurav said:
Again, Y don't U post your 3DMark scores, I guess that is not NVIDIA or ATI optimized my score is 4108

Hmm.....though i dont believe in synthetic benchmarks much i m posting my 3Dmarks2003 scores .........These scores are with my newly acquired ATi Radeon 9600XT

3DMark2003 score:
4010

3DMark2001SE score: 11852

Aquamark score: 28,870.

Now earlier my scores with the Fx5200 were bad, but then that was a low end card. Now there's a massive performance gain. And no i havent overclocked my card yet.
 
OP
A

anidex

Broken In
Cool dude! I still dream of reaching 3500 with my card! I did overclock it once though and got a score of around 4200!
 
G

gxsaurav

Guest
for those who are on dial up

latest NVIDIA 61.77 Drivers, = 12 MB

Latest ATI Catalyst 4.9 = 42 MB (Driver + Catalyst control centre), U also need ,net runtime 1.1 installon your system, & if U are using U also need the 10 security update for .net runtime, so total size = 42+23+10 = 74 MB, & when catalyst 4.10 comes out download 42+ mb again

So, who want to get ATI on dial up
 
OP
A

anidex

Broken In
The new ATI Control Center screws nVIDIA's nView shit right back to hell! It's more than worth the download.
 
G

gxsaurav

Guest
Ah! CCC, 74 MB on Dial Up, better then nvidia, but where, I didn't see anything it gives over nview

Oh! , do U know what nview is, not even a control panel, it's simply a 2D Desktop management tool something ATI don't have even with CCC, my old Radeon sold to that friend is using these, & he is sick, cos, he can't caonfigure everything he used to before, he is back to the classic control panel
 
G

gxsaurav

Guest
& CCC is so better, that U need to spare a lot of HD space, a lot of useless services in the background, while NVIDIA, true plug & play, install the drivers & play whatever U wan't no worries or configuration
 
G

gxsaurav

Guest
*www.neoseeker.com/Articles/Hardware/Features/aticccfeature/2.html

Go here ANIDEX, U said OpenGL is dead for gaming, well even ATI IS USING OpenGL based 3D settings preview animation in C3
 
OP
A

anidex

Broken In
Bottom line is that YOU ARE A SNOB WHO DOESN'T LISTEN TO PEOPLE BECAUSE OF EGO PROBLEMS. Either that OR YOU'RE JUST PLAIN STUPID :lol:!
 
G

gxsaurav

Guest
anidex said:
Bottom line is that YOU ARE A SNOB WHO DOESN'T LISTEN TO PEOPLE BECAUSE OF EGO PROBLEMS. Either that OR YOU'RE JUST PLAIN STUPID :lol:!

WHAT M I, Can U clerify that

oh! & Just to remind U of OpenGL again

Quake 3 Arena - All time hit OpenGL
Return to castle wolfenstein - Big Daddy - OpenGL
Medal of Honus series & mods - OpenGL, LAN & Multiplayer god
CoD & Battlefield series OpenGL, again multiplayer gems

So, I m waht, stupid, well, U know what even I like DX but does it means that OpenGL is nothing, plz, PS3 will be using OpenGL 2.0b, so sony is fool according to U
 
OP
A

anidex

Broken In
And the games that use DirectX :-

Half Life 1
Half Life 2
NFS Underground
Will Rock
Far Cry (the DX9 renderer is far more advanced)
Halo 1
Halo 2
Unreal Tournament 2003/2004 (DirectX is the only decent renderer)
Unreal 2
Unreal Engine 3

... and a hundred other :lol:!

Hell, even JC's next engine will most likely be in DirectX!

BTW dude, I was refering to your anti-ATI attitude as well ;).

he is sick, cos, he can't caonfigure everything he used to before, he is back to the classic control panel
Does he also have trouble tying his shoe-laces :lol:?

So, I m waht, stupid, well, U know what even I like DX but does it means that OpenGL is nothing, plz, PS3 will be using OpenGL 2.0b, so sony is fool according to U
X-Box 2 will use the superset of DirectX 9. So what's your point?
 
G

gxsaurav

Guest
Look what I said, I don't hate DX, i have played all the games U listed except for the still unreleased HL2, in DX mode, & I m happy with the performance. I said I hate U when U say OpenGL is dead, wake up dude, Linux, Unix, Mac all OpenGL, gaming market on mac, if it is bad then Y they release games ported to opengl for mac

Oh! & DX is dead, next up is a tottly new thing XNA,

Also OpenGL 2.0 has full support for everything DX can do in Shader Model 3.0, even U can make shaders in OpenGL just like U can in DX, so which do U thin is better, DX which runs on Windows Only, or OpenGL which runs on everything, even mobile, and do the same things with OpenGL as U do with DX

Oh! every one is not a geek like U, hell, even I m not a coder

JC next engine will be DX, biggest Joke of Century, where U get that from

XBOX 2 DX 9, no it will use XNA 1.0 , now what do U say, if DX is that good then Y MS is changing the whole code

Bottom line,we both are correct at our places, DX is good as well as OpenGL is good, but both have their own market, DX is Windows Only, if U say DX DX DX , then U are also directly saying that the gfx foundation of Linux & Mac sucks,

Ah! Mac UI, so much better the Windows XP with anything , again OpenGL

Cut the crap, U know now I m liking to fight with U, comon, bring it on
 
G

gxsaurav

Guest
Oh! I just remember, Doom3, OpenGL, is coming for XBOX, now tell me, how can XBOX run OpenGL when it can only run DX, hey, even MS can't deny the existence of OpenGL, thats Y they made XBOX perform with OpenGL, even XNA will support OpenGL 2.0b, so that PC games running on Windows, made in OpenGL or XNA can be easily ported to console, XBOX2 or PS3 or Game cube 2
 
OP
A

anidex

Broken In
Oh! & DX is dead, next up is a tottly new thing XNA
Dude, XNA is a unified development platform like Visual Studio, specifically meant for XBox 2, not a graphics API.

Windows Graphics Foundation (or WGF 1.0) is the new standard, equivalent of DirectX (it was formerly called DX9L). The DirectX Next specifications will be used for WGF 2.0, so DirectX isn't dead. OpenGL has been dead for some while now since it hasn't seen ny revolutionary developments like DirectX has.

Also OpenGL 2.0 has full support for everything DX can do in Shader Model 3.0, even U can make shaders in OpenGL just like U can in DX, so which do U thin is better, DX which runs on Windows Only, or OpenGL which runs on everything, even mobile, and do the same things with OpenGL as U do with DX
The only thing is that most IHVs don't support proper ARB extensions necessary to exploit this. Most credit goes to your favorite nVIDIA :lol:!

Oh! every one is not a geek like U, hell, even I m not a coder
Firstly, I ain't no geek you SOB. No need to get personal. And what the hell was that about you knowing OpenGL coding? Were you shitting everyone then? Biting back on your own words, huh? I guess it happens to people when they haven't been laid for a while :lol:!

JC next engine will be DX, biggest Joke of Century, where U get that from
In case you didn't know, JC's been attending DirectX seminars because he's tired of the way the IHVs have completely destroyed OpenGL with vendor specific extensions. He said that he would gladly move over to DirectX if the IHVs don't get their act together.

XBOX 2 DX 9, no it will use XNA 1.0 , now what do U say, if DX is that good then Y MS is changing the whole code
Again, XNA is a development tool, not an API. What you say there is just about as dumb as asking why the vendors and the ARB commity add new extensions :lol:! Unfortunately for you, Microsoft is keeping the structure of WGF very similar to DirectX.

Ah! Mac UI, so much better the Windows XP with anything , again OpenGL
That's a matter of personal taste. So what's your point?

Oh! I just remember, Doom3, OpenGL, is coming for XBOX, now tell me, how can XBOX run OpenGL when it can only run DX
The XBox port of Doom 3 will use Direct3D. In case you didn't know, the XBox doesn't and cannot support OpenGL.

And for the last time, XNA is a development platform, not a graphics API. Finally, get your facts straight, buddy.
 

crackshot

Broken In
with directX 9.0c out it would be really hard to say which GFX card is resonably future proof
certainly the one which supports PixelShader 3.0 & vertexshader 3.0.
n the one that does would cost no less than Rs30000
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom