What the use of graphics which can't be seen on appropriate hardware. Also gameplay wasn't upto the mark for me. As for graphics it was just deja vu of previous games.
Let me give you an example. Crysis was awesome with damn good graphics then came Crysis 2 which also had pretty good graphics but it was criticised heavily. Why ?? You can't just ride on success of series you nee to do better and BO had nothing new.
I can understand your frustation with The Glitches as i myslef have similar experience in that regard but BO excels in Story.A Perfect One IMO.
And dont forget about the Multiplayer my friend.
It has quite a lot of improvements over the previous in the series.
LOL for Crysis 2.
First of all Crysis 2 has proven to be the Champ of Console Gaming so 90% of legit buyers of gamers are satisfied.It pushes the limits of Console Hardware.
So no criticism from majority of Audience.
Rest 10% of PC Game buyers were dealt using DX11 Ultra Upgrade.
Crysis 2 is a critically acclaimed game in all regards.To call it heavily criticised is not worth it.It received Positive reviews from professional gamers.
The rest of audience overreacted to the DX9 version as if they are playing quake arena instead of Crysis 2.!
As far as the remaining PC audience is concerned,The freebie lovers are not meant to be satisfied neither they can ever be satisfied.
Comparing C2 with BO is vague.
At the end of the day one has to agree that COD is the reigning King of the FPS world even if it doesnt deserve it now.
ITS A CULT.
[Over A weeks has passed since Crysis 3 gameplay has been released and yet its views on youtube is somewhere close 1million or so .
Not even 5 days have passed and BOII Reveal trailer has crossed 15+Million Views.Breaking multiple records as usual;This how we define CULT.]