Sony DSC-HX9v Camera : Your Review
warrior047
In the zone
check out the dpreview and dcresource sites...for the same. Imaging resource is one amazing channel
aroraanant
Explorer
I have goty hands on it and even my friends own it.its a very nice cam and i dont think there is any other P&S cam in thhat budget which is better than it
warrior047
In the zone
sounava....do u think buying fz35 is really good for 15k? Is it better than fz47 for the image quality
warrior047
In the zone
how abt sx230 or hx9v? Am also looking at super zoom...sx30 canon or hx100v or fz100 panasonic?
whatsmyname2u
Right off the assembly line
HX9v is excellent if you are looking for a camera that can give you good image quality, superb video and also lots of features(3d, gps, panorama etc).
if only good quality photos is your requirement then the canon sx220 would be better.
if only good quality photos is your requirement then the canon sx220 would be better.
sharma_atul85
Journeyman
Hi, Sony HX9V is best . you can review the under images for more clarity.
These images are of Buddha Temple in dehradun and in evening.
size of image is around 4MB. though size has been reduced here while uploading.
And it cost me 14, 600 via letsbuy.com earlier month. HX100v has better zoom only (30X compared to 16X of HX9V) and rest of the features were same.
These images are of Buddha Temple in dehradun and in evening.
size of image is around 4MB. though size has been reduced here while uploading.
And it cost me 14, 600 via letsbuy.com earlier month. HX100v has better zoom only (30X compared to 16X of HX9V) and rest of the features were same.
aniket.cain
Padawan
The pictures that you have posted here are not full resolution. I have seen a lot of pictures online, and this camera applies very severe noise reduction which results in loss of details, and the images look like watercolor at full resolutions. Canon SX220/220 would have been better image quality wise.
Stuge
Youngling
Just want to point out .
good image quality will depend on the camera and Excellent /Good /Poor or whatever quality photos will depend on the photographers skills
aniket.cain
Padawan
And here is something for you:
'Compact Travel Zoom' Camera Group Test (Q3 2011) Review: 10. Compared to (JPEG): Digital Photography Review
Be sure to check all the areas, like the hair on the bottom right. You will notice that Canon resolves more details than the Sony and produces truer colors too.
Also,
Canon PowerShot SX230 HS vs Sony Cyber-shot HX9V vs Panasonic Lumix TZ20 / ZS10 Noise
At higher ISOs, see the details of SX230 and HX9v.
And,
HX9V vs SX230
Check for details in all the tests.
Just want to point out .
good image quality will depend on the camera and Excellent /Good /Poor or whatever quality photos will depend on the photographers skills
Now you are just sharpshooting. You know he was just talking about the image quality of the cameras.
Last edited:
aniket.cain
Padawan
The links I have posted are from 3 different sites. And the same thing about the too aggressive NR is being said about the HX9V everywhere. And about the color, Sonys are well known to oversaturate their pictures so that average users would find them more appealing.
I hope you all will agree that Canon SX230 is better than Sony HX9V when it comes to IQ.
aroraanant
Explorer
Hey I have used HX9V,the features it has no other camera in that budget has....
aniket.cain
Padawan
It might have a few extra features, but it hasn't got that quality. Canon SX230HS has better pictures, and the full manual mode. The Canon is more suited to enthusiasts whereas the Sony is for general consumers. Those looking for quality will opt for Canon, and those looking for features will opt for Sony.