Samsung's answer to Motorola V3Razor

[Biplav]

This phone is about to be launched in India.


The SPH-N2000 is 14.5 mm thin, it's VOD (Video-On-Demand) and MOD (Music-On-Demand) capable, it has a 1.3 megapixel camera and it has 120 MByte of memory to store MP3's. It has GPS integrated and reads PDF, JPG, TXT and several other file formats. But we will say it again: it's dropdead gorgeous!
*www.tomshardware.com/hardnews/images/news_pics_9670_1.jpg
Click here for Source

 

[bendre123]

i dont think so.
motorola is best.
because it has style and various feature

 

[Nemesis]

@bendre123: The Samsung seems more feature-rich to me

But where is the image? Even on Tom's Hardware I didn't find the image.

Edit: I believe this is the image:

*www.ubergizmo.com/photos/samsung_razor_large.jpg

 

[icecoolz]

Motorola Razor sucks for the pricing. Its thin yes but its also quite broad. And it doesnt even have a cam in it. The Samsung phone will beat the Razor quite easily...to pulp!

 

[drgrudge]

Motorola Razor v3 sucks bigtimes.. it has got almost nil features but costs around 20k..

This phone is definetly gonna be better than the moto.

 

[Biplav]

sorry but i think the site has removed the image!
cant hepl it . when i made this thread there was a photo , bt now i will search for a new site containing the picture.

 

[Keith Sebastian]

sorry but i think the site has removed the image!
cant hepl it . when i made this thread there was a photo , bt now i will search for a new site containing the picture.

A ha! Toms hammer's got you It's alway the case with tomshardware direct links to images. You'll get hammered in no time.

Here's a better link
*www.ubergizmo.com/15/archives/2005/06/samsung_sphn200.html

Don't you love those cute little slit eyed hunnybunny's. (I mean the girl, not the phone)

Keith

 

[Delpiero]

This one's better than the razer IMO. Seems to have more features than than the razer as well.
BTW keith correct your siggy it should be stronger and not stranger if i am right.

 

[Biplav]

thanx keith! anyways i personally do think its a better phone but moto razor still got more points on looks.!

 

[Keith Sebastian]

This one's better than the razer IMO. Seems to have more features than than the razer as well.
BTW keith correct your siggy it should be stronger and not stranger if i am right.

you're right , but i'm strange

-keith

 

[djmykey]

ok heres da pic. Nemi ur posted pic doesnt open up here

*img232.echo.cx/img232/4797/samsungrazorlarge8br.th.jpg

 

[Delpiero]

you're right , but i'm strange

-keith

LOL

 

[Nemesis]

@DJ: Thanks for the thumbnail. IF you want to see my image, right click on it and select Show Image

That worked for me

 

[rohanbee]

Do you think its fair to compare samsungs latest offering with motorola's old one.........v razor has been there for quite a bit now........It';s less memory space has been a bone of contention for along time now.........maybe thats what was its undoing.......

 

[Nemesis]

Low memory coupled with an insanely high price was what sunk the RAZR. $499 for a phone that gives me nothing except good looks? No Sir! I'd rather get something that gives me better VFM.

 

[Biplav]

yah but since they fall in the same price category so i think its justiciable to compare
them.
moto v3 razon had GR8 LOOKS!no denying that
Yes- but none other than that. lol

 

[kbsg]

Samsung is far better!!
Moto sux!