panacea_amc
CBZ is better than Pulsar
Hello guys,
I am a first timer to DSLR thing and after reading reviews, am confused again. I went through some pics in flicker.
# D1200 (Cannon) shows up grains in not so bright areas.
plz look at this pic in the tree areas, grains are easily visible = *www.flickr.com/photos/defqon/16287867419/
again, grains are easily noticeable in the trees here = *www.flickr.com/photos/34953413@N04/16013669602/
but, this pic is shot in a bright sunny day and its quite good for the same cam = *www.flickr.com/photos/digitalmarbles/18211699788/
#Nikon D5100 doesnt show up any grains in relatively darkly lit areas = *www.flickr.com/photos/elizbeth_brannin/8705306905/
and this = *www.flickr.com/photos/agrusoft/12212249826/
Now coming to price,
d1200 with 18-55 + 55-250 mm lens comes around to 28K whereas d5100 with 18-55mm around 30K,
spending 28k and getting grainy images in dark conditions is a serious flaw, even though we get an extra free lens with it; the nag will always remain in the mind. So, why not spend extra 2k and get good pics. 55-250 mm is definately handy but the need for good images will require a complete camera to be bought whereas need for additional lenses can be done at a much lesser cost.
Please comment guys.
And what about Nikon D5200. it also comes with 18-55mm lens and is around the same price=30K, between d5100 n d5200, which would be your choice?
thanks in advance
I am a first timer to DSLR thing and after reading reviews, am confused again. I went through some pics in flicker.
# D1200 (Cannon) shows up grains in not so bright areas.
plz look at this pic in the tree areas, grains are easily visible = *www.flickr.com/photos/defqon/16287867419/
again, grains are easily noticeable in the trees here = *www.flickr.com/photos/34953413@N04/16013669602/
but, this pic is shot in a bright sunny day and its quite good for the same cam = *www.flickr.com/photos/digitalmarbles/18211699788/
#Nikon D5100 doesnt show up any grains in relatively darkly lit areas = *www.flickr.com/photos/elizbeth_brannin/8705306905/
and this = *www.flickr.com/photos/agrusoft/12212249826/
Now coming to price,
d1200 with 18-55 + 55-250 mm lens comes around to 28K whereas d5100 with 18-55mm around 30K,
spending 28k and getting grainy images in dark conditions is a serious flaw, even though we get an extra free lens with it; the nag will always remain in the mind. So, why not spend extra 2k and get good pics. 55-250 mm is definately handy but the need for good images will require a complete camera to be bought whereas need for additional lenses can be done at a much lesser cost.
Please comment guys.
And what about Nikon D5200. it also comes with 18-55mm lens and is around the same price=30K, between d5100 n d5200, which would be your choice?
thanks in advance
Last edited: