nix said:
@yamraj: what crimes have they not comitted? its not about saddam, but when it comes to osama...there should be no doubt in anybody's mind...he's a religious fanatic who wants the whole world to convert to islam...
Saddam - USA supported him against Iran in the Iraq-Iran war. They even supplied the chemical and biological weapons to be used against Iranians, Kurds and others. USA gave the green signal to Saddam, when he asked for support for his attack on Kuwait. But then suddenly, USA changed its stance and attacked Iraq. It's all about regional politics and balance of power. As long as Saddam was playing a puppet in their hands, he was their boy. We all know what followed next, when he refused to do so later.
Osama - All we(most of us) know about him and his "Al Qaeda" is through American media - the likes of CNN. According to some independent experts, there was never a terrorist group named Al Qaeda. CIA invented this name, just as they forged countless insuegent groups against Cuba, Iran and some African countries. Osama was only a scapegoat. He never had that kind of money, technical expertise and willingless to attack USA on their ground.
There is a lot more to the reality than we know of. There are many "inside jobs" ongoing in both Afghanistan and Iraq that are blamed on Al Qaeda and Iran respectively. There is no such thing as the "War on Terror". It's about as fake as silicon b**bs.
Many won't [like to] believe that attack on our Parliament (and the IA plane hijacking) could also have been fabricated. Just as the Patriot law was being cleared in US congress easily, after the 9/11, our great politicians were keeping a keen eye on the happenings. Soon , the Paliament was attacked and POTA was modelled after the Patriot in USA. Unfortunately, we never had the balls to attack Pakistan like USA did with Afghanistan and later - Iraq.
