Well well, still the over-clocked Intel's X6800 Core 2 Extreme came only close to 5046 Mhz... Don't you know there's already a not-over-clocked AMD X2 5000+ and FX-62 out there in the market??
Georgy_Can said:
I Think the reason for overclocking is to show how a mid end product can compete with the next-gen product by simple overclocking.
I agree with you on that @ Georgy_Can. But I think we should also consider the situations that had to be created for this Intel processor to be over-clocked to that extent so that it won't burn! You must consider the temperature issues... I stress this because these were the test machine specifications:
Intel Core 2 Extreme X6800 @ 5040MHz (11x458MHz, 1.73v)
Mousepot LN2 cooling -125°C (Coldbugg at -128°C)
ASUS P5W HD Deluxe (i975X)
Corsair XMS2-PC8000UL 458MHz 4-3-2-1 1:1 (2.8v)
OCZ 600W
WAKE UP Friends!
speedyguy said:
alrite lets play....i dun think bench markers r fools to o/c just intel...they must hv kept somthing in mind....check some more stuffs dude n stay updated
cheers
Well, I don't think these bench-marks and system confiurations were used on an AMD!