GPU NEWS Channel

gagan_kumar

Wise Old Owl
470 is already pulling ahead of 1060 6GB in BF1 lol

*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161018/bd23615cdff10966c74273fcd42201c3.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161018/bb0634a88be9c3984a9f167b07468e0c.jpg

So yeah as more games use Vulkan/DX12,470 will pull ahead of 1060

Sent from my Redmi Note 3

wait for nvidia's magical drivers
 

mohit9206

Ambassador of Buzz
1050 2gb and 1050Ti 4GB announced at $109 and $139 respectively launching Oct 25 onwards.
NVIDIA Announces GeForce GTX 1050 Ti & GTX 1050: Entry-Level Cards Launching October 25t
Expecting 10k and 13k respectively.
Seems like decent value for money.
 

ZTR

Cyborg Agent
If 1050 comes under 10k and also gives 960 like performance it could be the next budget king after 750Ti

Sent from my Redmi Note 3
 

supergamer

supa supa
1050 2gb and 1050Ti 4GB announced at $109 and $139 respectively launching Oct 25 onwards.
NVIDIA Announces GeForce GTX 1050 Ti & GTX 1050: Entry-Level Cards Launching October 25t
Expecting 10k and 13k respectively.
Seems like decent value for money.

Finally.. poor Indian gamer's Lord and Saviours have arrived..
Nvidia's turd class x50 series.. inspired by Intel 5% annual performance increase.
 

mohit9206

Ambassador of Buzz
If 1050 comes under 10k and also gives 960 like performance it could be the next budget king after 750Ti

Sent from my Redmi Note 3
1050 will give 950 performance and 1050Ti will give 960 performance.
Finally.. poor Indian gamer's Lord and Saviours have arrived..
Nvidia's turd class x50 series.. inspired by Intel 5% annual performance increase.
Annual 5% would mean only 15% over 3 years but 1050 is 300% the performance of 650.
*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161018/dedd34cb68a57f50dd4568662444a07f.jpg
 

ZTR

Cyborg Agent
1050 will give 950 performance and 1050Ti will give 960 performance.

Annual 5% would mean only 15% over 3 years but 1050 is 300% the performance of 650.
*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161018/dedd34cb68a57f50dd4568662444a07f.jpg
If 1050 gives 950 perf then no use
Ideally it should 1050 will give 960 perf and 1050Ti will be for those wanting best under 15k since currently no card is there for those people

Sent from my Redmi Note 3
 

mohit9206

Ambassador of Buzz
If 1050 gives 950 perf then no use
Ideally it should 1050 will give 960 perf and 1050Ti will be for those wanting best under 15k since currently no card is there for those people

Sent from my Redmi Note 3
In 6 months RX470 will come below 15k so that would be the best card under 15k.
 

ZTR

Cyborg Agent
If 470 comes below 15k it would be great but it won't happen
Max to Max it will come to 16k


Sent from my Redmi Note 3
 

Pasapa

Live to die another day
470 is already pulling ahead of 1060 6GB in BF1 lol

*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161018/bd23615cdff10966c74273fcd42201c3.jpg*uploads.tapatalk-cdn.com/20161018/bb0634a88be9c3984a9f167b07468e0c.jpg

So yeah as more games use Vulkan/DX12,470 will pull ahead of 1060

Sent from my Redmi Note 3
Battlefield 1 PC graphics benchmark review - Graphics card performance 1080

Different results here. Performance is almost equal though.

Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk
 

supergamer

supa supa
gtx 1070 firmware update for Memory issue

cards fitted with Samsung memory do not have any issues, however some manufacturers have or switched towards Micron chips, and these are the culprit of the reported issues. Especially during overclocking of the graphics memory problems will appear fast with bad results like checkerboard patterns.
 

chimera201

Wise Old Owl
AMD Wants You to Choose Radeon RX 470 Over the GTX 1050 Ti, For Now | techPowerU

- - - Updated - - -

Battlefield 1 performance:
Battlefield 1 Benchmarked: Graphics & CPU Performance > CPU Performance - TechSpot


*www.techspot.com/articles-info/1267/bench/1080p.png

*www.techspot.com/articles-info/1267/bench/CPU_FuryX.png

*www.techspot.com/articles-info/1267/bench/CPU_GTX1080.png
 

jasku

In the zone
It's incredibly stupid of AMD to compare their mid-range GPU with competitor's entry level GPU.
The entry level, mid range are merely categories, as long as the cards in the similar price point, people will opt for best bang for the buck.

Sent from my SM-G925I using Tapatalk
 

mohit9206

Ambassador of Buzz
It's incredibly stupid of AMD to compare their mid-range GPU with competitor's entry level GPU.
In India 1050Ti at 13k and RX470 at 18k.So price difference is 5k($75) which is huge. But in US price difference is only $30(2k) so it makes more sense there but not here.
 

Pasapa

Live to die another day
In India 1050Ti at 13k and RX470 at 18k.So price difference is 5k($75) which is huge. But in US price difference is only $30(2k) so it makes more sense there but not here.
Spending the extra 5k is common sense since the performance difference will be great.

Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk
 

mohit9206

Ambassador of Buzz
Spending the extra 5k is common sense since the performance difference will be great.

Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk
By that logic why not spend another 5k and get 1060 6GB? Performance will be even greater.
There is no reference card review :facepalm:

*tpucdn.com/reviews/MSI/GTX_1050_Ti_Gaming_X/images/perfrel_1920_1080.png
There will be only 5% performance difference between stock and overclocked cards so best to avoid overpriced rip off models like msi gaming x and asus strixx and buy the basic models and overclock yourself.
1050ti is pretty good value for money.
Rx460 is now irreverent.
10k - 1050 2gb
13k- 1050ti 4gb
17k - rx470 4gb
22k - 1060 6GB
There is no place for rx460 2gb unless it drops to 8k.
 

Pasapa

Live to die another day
^what I'm trying to say is that if you are willing to spend a little more money than your initial budget you would get a big performance boost.. An extra 5k to get the 1060 will lead to a drastic increase in budget with respect to the initial budget. I really don't see a problem with my logic...

Sent from my XT1572 using Tapatalk
 
Top Bottom