G
gxsaurav
Guest
This just in,
ah! forget it, ANIDEX will start screaming again
ah! forget it, ANIDEX will start screaming again
- Status
G
gxsaurav
Guest
Go ask any linux user which gfx card he preferes keeping in mind the availability of drivers, & support, his answer will be NVIDIA, the ATI drivers for Linux are tottly useless,
Now U will say DX is better then OpenGl,
DX only works on Windows
Linux is a bad move from Open Source Community
Y should ATI support Linux developement in drivers when it has only little market share compared to Windows,
Go fight with the Linux junkies here, like tuxfan or GNURag, even I like WIndows but thats because of Windows, not gfx card, it's my opinion, I don't shout on linux or tell them to use Windows, it's their will, just like it's my will to se NVIDIA
oh! ATI releases new drivers every 27 days cos they need to, NVIDIA drivers are less buggy,so they don't need to update them everymonth, they work flowlessly
Since U R Anti OpenGL, then U are also Anti Linux
Now U will say DX is better then OpenGl,
DX only works on Windows
Linux is a bad move from Open Source Community
Y should ATI support Linux developement in drivers when it has only little market share compared to Windows,
Go fight with the Linux junkies here, like tuxfan or GNURag, even I like WIndows but thats because of Windows, not gfx card, it's my opinion, I don't shout on linux or tell them to use Windows, it's their will, just like it's my will to se NVIDIA
oh! ATI releases new drivers every 27 days cos they need to, NVIDIA drivers are less buggy,so they don't need to update them everymonth, they work flowlessly
Since U R Anti OpenGL, then U are also Anti Linux
OP
plasmafire
Journeyman
plasmafire said:
how come i see a lot of rant but no answers..borrowind cards was not easy..
SO ANSWER ME.....
G
gxsaurav
Guest
Plasma fire
WHAT EXECTLY are U asking, ATI cards have a bit better Anis tropic filtring then nvidia so that may have made U belive that ATI gave U better image quality, but it was sharper then NVIDIA not clear
WHAT EXECTLY are U asking, ATI cards have a bit better Anis tropic filtring then nvidia so that may have made U belive that ATI gave U better image quality, but it was sharper then NVIDIA not clear
OP
plasmafire
Journeyman
THE EDGES.. THEY WERE MORE JAGGED in nv
G
gxsaurav
Guest
Maybe U were playing with AA disabled in NV case,
OP
plasmafire
Journeyman
i'm not a noob. i'm..well.. a techie.
2x aa,2x aniso in both cases
2x aa,2x aniso in both cases
I would like an answer to that as well ... why do radeon's have better image quality? Any reason?
BTW, gx, ATi drivers for linux do exist and I have a friend who uses ATi 3D acceleration in linux (OpenGL) without any problem ...
And why all this fighting? Use what is better for your purpose, regardless of the company.
BTW, gx, ATi drivers for linux do exist and I have a friend who uses ATi 3D acceleration in linux (OpenGL) without any problem ...
And why all this fighting? Use what is better for your purpose, regardless of the company.
N
nikhilesh
Guest
this has turned out to be very informative.
G
gxsaurav
Guest
ATI drivers for Linux do exist, i know, but they are nothingt compared to NVIDIA, I started a thread on Anandtech, to find what the US guys think about getting, ATI or NVIDIA when it comes to Linux go here to check it, & then tell me, those guys have NVIDIA & ATI both availabel & for cheap
NikhilVerma
Padawan
nikhilesh said:
YEAH...
And for the first time I would like to say ...
Keep fighting guys!!!
Dude, the problem with gxsaurav is that he doesn't respect anybody else's views and rants on without thinking. He's been doing it for a while now and that's bothering the hell outta me.
What nonsense are you talking? I was comparing the price of the Radeon 9600 XT, which happens to be much lesser than that of the GeForce FX 5700 Ultra.
You're comparing the GeForce 6800 Ultra with the 9800 XT
! Now who's the idiot 
?Sorry to break it to you buddy, but the R520 supports just about every feature called for by the DX9c specifications, including fp32 filtering and blending and adaptive tessellation. nVIDIA should catch up with the R520 in about... 20 years
!Sure nVIDIA is better at Marketting. But that's the problem! If they put the same effort into making cards, they'd beat ATI hands down
(or perhaps not)!Funny, cause I got my card within 3 days of ordering
! Now I wonder why... ?Sure they do. Only problem is that it runs slower than their last-last-generation product!
As far as temporal anti-aliasing is concerned, you haven't understood anything about it... nVIDIOT (doh)
!Yeah sure, when the whole world knows that nVIDIA is doing shader replacements and ATI runs them like they're supposed to, Einstein here hypothesizes the other way around
!Is that supposed to be funny? OK, let me try tickling myself... maybe I'll laugh then...
!Cause nVIDIA generally shifts to partial precision (16-bit) to get decent framerates, whereas ATI runs all shading calculations at 24-bit precision. That along with shader replacements leads to the overall degradation in the quality. Not to speak of ATI's superior anti-aliasing and anisotropic filtering capabilities
!crusader77
Broken In
hehe, just what i was bout to say..
But guys just chill...
G
gxsaurav
Guest
U R back, well, I won't comment if I do, then this battle will continue & I want to end this
gamefreak14
Journeyman
Superior...eh? Now how would FSAA and AF differ in quality on both cards? And why is it superior from that of nvidias? Care to enlighten me?anidex said:
Btw, everyone!This is not a fight. It's simply an argument. GX, you are starting to sound like an (NV)Idiot...just kidding
netcracker
Journeyman
yeah,why is anidex & gxsaurav fighting.Let us make a healthy discussion here.This is realy informative.
- Status