Crysis 3

[Skud]

True , But still this "directx 11 must gpu crap" will make the game less available to customers ...

DX 9 has completed a decade this month, even 9.0c is 8 years old, and 10/10.1 are useless. I understand lots of people will be left out, but they have made the right call. Hopefully, this will mean a leaner game which runs well on various dx11 hardware. Crysis does have doubtful record as far as graphical implementation goes, first they artificially prevented DX9 users to use Very High settings in Crysis, and then the tessellation fiasco in Crysis 2, not to mention the original C2 launching without DX11 and just 04 options to tweak graphics. Lets hope this time around they are really serious about giving PC gamers the ultimate graphical extravaganza. They have indicated in their forums that the screenshot of Advanced Settings is a bit old, and quite a few options have already been added. Good going so far I would say.

Care to elaborate a little on that 'gameplay' you're expecting?



Graphics is what they specialize in, they did drop the ball with Crysis 2 on graphics and limit(streamline) the gameplay, and look what happened, huge backlash on them, and now that they're going back, people will still complain

I personally won't mind this game to be a technological demo as long as they are allowing the proper hardware owners to enjoy the demo.

 

[thetechfreak]

which card do you have?

9500Gt

Also, no support for XP points to that.

updating software is lot easier than hardware.

 

[cyborg47]

9500gt and crysis!?

 

[thetechfreak]

9500gt and crysis!?

Well if I mentioned the whole config of my last PC that I got Crysis 2 running at 35 FPS you will be mad lol
It was a celeron based 9500gt. Still using the GPU though.
Easily got 35 fps on old PC with gamer settings at 800x600

 

[Skud]

I guess you were not so lucky with the original Crysis.

 

[quad_core]

A bit of OT :


"
Hi-Performance

Windows Vista, Windows 7 or Windows 8
Latest DirectX 11 graphics card
Latest quad core CPU
8GB Memory

Example 1 (Nvidia/Intel):

• NVidia GTX 680
• Intel Core i7-2600k

Example 2 (AMD):

• AMD Radeon HD7970
• AMD Bulldozer FX4150
"

AMD Bulldozer FX4150 recommended for high performance ?

 

[gameranand]

Oh well if its requiring latest Quad core CPU for high performance then what do you expect eh....

 

[thetechfreak]

@Skud crysis 2is lot more optimsied than original game. Hence it worked fine.

AMD Bulldozer FX4150 recommended for high performance ?

Problem?

 

[quad_core]

@Skud crysis 2is lot more optimsied than original game. Hence it worked fine.


Problem?

no problem at all .. Happy to see that the recommended CPU for "High performance" is AMD Bulldozer FX4150

 

[Skud]

@Skud crysis 2is lot more optimsied than original game. Hence it worked fine.


Problem?

The original one or the later one with DX11 and Texture pack?

 

[iittopper]

Care to elaborate a little on that 'gameplay' you're expecting?



Graphics is what they specialize in, they did drop the ball with Crysis 2 on graphics and limit(streamline) the gameplay, and look what happened, huge backlash on them, and now that they're going back, people will still complain

In short , like crysis 1

 

[d3p]

In short , like crysis 1

In brief, Crysis or Crysis Warhead was one of its kind. Just like the Metro 2033.

IMO, its hard to expect a huge change in gameplay when it comes to sequels. Developer might change the storyline, make it look more realistic with good AI, but end of the day people will still complain saying the storyline / background score / graphics bug / Prices is not upto the mark blah blah.

.Crysis & Crysis Warhead was so graphics hungry back then, that's why many latest hardware at that time failed to provide max out graphics.
But Crysis 2 was well optimized of his generation hardware. Graphics was much better with the upgrade of Ultra Graphics Pack & DX11 upgrades ignoring the storyline

Its very much similar to what EA has done with MW & MW reboot. So either we better accept the gameplay how its designed & appreciate the way it is or stop playing. End users choice.

 

[cyborg47]

In short , like crysis 1

Aren't you bored of the same setting?

 

[iittopper]

Aren't you bored of the same setting?

Ofcourse not , I am not even bored with even call of duty series ..

 

[ithehappy]

Crysis & Crysis Warhead was so graphics hungry back then

Back then?

Anyway, the high graphics requirement is a letdown. I am S A D.

 

[cyborg47]

Set the graphics on medium dude, your rig will easily handle the game.

 

[NVIDIAGeek]

Ofcourse not , I am not even bored with even call of duty series ..

*www.myfacewhen.net/uploads/714-epic-facepalm.jpg

kthxbai.

 

[cyborg47]

badas-s iittopper is badas-s!

 

[ithehappy]

Set the graphics on medium dude, your rig will easily handle the game.

I have a problem, I either play at max or don't play! Lol, but that I do.

 

[digitfan]

Back then?

Anyway, the high graphics requirement is a letdown. I am S A D.

To give you a clear picture you can max it out if the final version is similar to the alpha one.In alpha i was getting 60+ all the time with ultra settings with Gtx 570.

*www.myfacewhen.net/uploads/714-epic-facepalm.jpg

kthxbai.

whats wrong with call of duty series care to explain?I too love it.Which game is different far cry 1,2,3? crysis 1,2,3? is far cry 1 set on land far cry 2 set on water and far cry 3 set on air?
Dude you dont like then dont play it no one is forcing you to play it or like it.Dont tease others because of their taste.