mail2and
Walking, since 2004.
gx_saurav said:For a phone of Rs 11k, i would have expected 2mp camera, rest looks fine. & the 235 MHz CPU is ARM not the usual X86. There is no direct comparison.
I was not comparing it to x86 processors, but rather to Nokia's previous generation phone processors.
As for the camera, does the MP rating really matter? Without optical zoom, there is no camera that is worth it. I have always been against camera on phones, and will continue to be so.
Your phone is worth buying , just not as cool & sexy as a SE phone though in looks department
SE phones look cool? Ugh. Don't get me wrong, but they're very thick. Go out and check the thickness. If you like those designs, it is good for you, but for heaven's sake stop making generalizations.
SE W700i is 20 mm thick throughout, whereas the thickest point on the E50 is 16.9 mm, and at the slimmest point, it is around 11 mm thick.
And, oh yes, the speaker on the E50 is much louder than that on W800i, W810i or W700i. It's not as good as the one on W550i, which is marginally better.
As for the coolness factor, I do not have the habit of flashing my phone on every occasion possible. It's also got to do with taste.