CDMA technologies are far better than GSM. any doubts, check on web.GSM is in the verge of serious facelifts around the world. I have been a BPL/Orange subscriber for 4 years in mumbai, with roaming enabled, GPRS, bla blah.And i was reasonabily satisfied with GSM service, until one fine day i opt for a Reliance phone. Initially their service sucked big time,so i kept the other 2 GSM's, and this Reliance. Now, I have 3 reliance phones, 0 GSm's . I agree,that the battery life on many CDMA's cannot be matched with tht of GSM'sjsut bcoz of one thing...The batteries sucks big time.but the newer models comes with good batteries..Still, power consumption in CDMA is a little bit higher than that of GSM, bcoz of ttechnical reasons.. And as far as voice clarity and sucess of connections are concrned, CDMA is the King. i have experienced less than 0.5 % call failure rates and that too bcoz of poor coverage. I have never experience any problem in service where there is a reasonable coverage.(In case o f reliance,we can talk sucessfully when there is only one "danda"in our signal strength meter, which is absolutely not possible in GSM without breaks.
I prefer CDMA technology and Reliance as their rates are tooo good.
now, compare net access through GPRS and CDMA. gprs = 15 kbps max.
Reliance = 120kbps (these are the figures i used to get whn i connect thru my laptop)
YES, all the handsets are not so good when compared w/ GSM ones. I hope this will be solved very soon.
We can manage to get one H/s from u.s .Many good models are available there , as many CDMA operators there.
we can get it programmed it by reliance/tata/other servic eproviders to suit their network.
CDMA = 90 Marks
GSM = 70 Marks.