Agreed absolutely.Pricing dosent justify.But is this reason enough to give it a score of 1,0 etc.It depends on tastes too.Had this game been priced fine by Activision, you wouldn't have seen any sort of trolling from anyone.
Get over it.
Wondering if someone actually spent Rs. 2,500 and then played it for the campaign.
Agreed with that. But it's not a good idea to make assumptions.Exactly if you have not spend Rs 2500 and still enjoyed its single player campaign then you should atleast have the courtesy to give it a rating which it actually deserves.As you do not have any right on this case to criticize it.
Try to understand it.
Try to look it from the scale of the preceding games and realise whether it contained something new. That said, what you could say is, the game contained same old stuff which people like.
I own bf bc2 and even its vietnam dlc.Used to play it a lot.Yes i agree bf is totally awesome as far as the multiplayer is concerned.tbh, I gave up Battlefield 3 campaign after 1 hour. I didn't bother to touch it after I formatted the system. It was meh. But multiplayer guys have had their money worth
Agreed absolutely.Pricing dosent justify.But is this reason enough to give it a score of 1,0 etc.It depends on tastes too.
If you are not a team player then cod is for you as battlefield requires team support.
Exactly if you have not spend Rs 2500 and still enjoyed its single player campaign then you should atleast have the courtesy to give it a rating which it actually deserves.As you do not have any right on this case to criticize it.
Try to understand it.
read the news about a sequel to black-ops might be in works
now doing the Spec-Ops missions they are better than campaign...