Hey nginx what do you think of opening up the enclosures of your External HDDs and making RAID 0+1 internal?
Why would he then buy externals @ higher price? *faints*Hey nginx what do you think of opening up the enclosures of your External HDDs and making RAID 0+1 internal?
Hey nginx what do you think of opening up the enclosures of your External HDDs and making RAID 0+1 internal?
Why would he then buy externals @ higher price? *faints*
I just asked what he thought of it...I did not ask you to debunk it because I know the consequences
The fact that the E3000 doesn't support USB printers and has only one USB port, alone kills the deal for me. I need atleast two ports, one for printer and another for HDD.
E3000 also has less RAM and flash than the Rt-N16.
Powered or non powered?
Hey nginx what do you think of opening up the enclosures of your External HDDs and making RAID 0+1 internal?
well I just posted some point to help you deciding. You will use that, so last decision will be yours
That'll not help much cause both give 300Mbps(max) wireless speed. But having less NVRAM can be a problem IMO.
And RT-N16 is a good router too. E3000 is preferred by advanced user who can tweak config.
I think you are underestimating the importance of the router's CPU and RAM. The speed is not a factor since even the cheapest N router offer 300mbps on 40Mhz. The more RAM a router has, the more number of simultaneous connections it can handle and that means downloading more torrents at one go without the router hanging up and requiring a reboot. The more processing power the router's CPU has, smoother will be its operation. This is where the Asus RT-N16 owns.
But hey thanks for laying the down the options on the table for me. Its always good to make comparisons before buying.
4x1 TB 5400 rpm ? Dude those details are like the ones salesman tell old people .. "latest model 5400 rpm it means its fastest market mein kahi nahi milega aisa cheez"//
It's Ok , build your Rig , we'll see it all together.
No issue with 5400 RPM, USB 2.0 can't even sustain more than 30MBps, while 5400 HDDs can sustain 60MBps bandwidth, so you are already bottlenecked by interface. USB 3.0 is another story, but anyway 7200 RPM hdds require more power than USB 2.0 can provide.I didn't quite get your post. What exactly do you want to know? If you want more details, why don't you tell me? Or are you saying 5400rpm is not good enough for external HDDs? Externals are not as fast as internals and 5400rpm is still standard spec for external HDDs.
No issue with 5400 RPM, USB 2.0 can't even sustain more than 30MBps, while 5400 HDDs can sustain 60MBps bandwidth, so you are already bottlenecked by interface. USB 3.0 is another story, but anyway 7200 RPM hdds require more power than USB 2.0 can provide.