await...microsoft antivirus.

[planetcall]

Linux is tested and developed by the whole world and still it cannot catch up with the ease of use and universal applicability of windows.... and any software writtern will contain bugs.... the only reason windos face such problem is because they are used most often.....

Exactly....that is why more popular IIS has more bugs. Frankly...I dont second the idea that popularity is directly proportional to the amount of bugs it has.

 

[anandk]

re ms anti-virus one care, check this too :
*www.thinkdigit.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=34956&highlight=onecare

 

[citizen1_8]

i guess u r all pretty harsh on MS. Wat OS do u all use inspite of all those errors.. Its pretty dominant and its profit makes it to create all those softwares.. u are not goin to use it if u don like it... then why such harsh statements.. it is ofcourse the leading software company. so i think it needs some respect

 

[n2casey]

Annoying everyone, it's a bad habbit of microsoft.
Shocking everyone, it's a bad habbit of microsoft.
Torturing everyone, it's a bad habbit of microsoft.
Cheating everyone, it's a bad habbit of microsoft.
...........
..........
...........


Then also we care for microsoft windows & try to protect it.

 

[AshishSharma]

Well most Virus Infections have been introduced by the so called Anti-Virus companies themselves to sell their products, now this might start a new war of infections and in that case the users will be the obvious loosers. Nyways who knows the bugs in it's operating system better than Microsoft itself.

Lets wait nd watch ...

 

[Tapomay]

Microsoft ROCKS, yes absolutely.

 

[JGuru]

Microsoft Windows sucks with very poor security, pathetic MSN Search, unstable O.S,
& next comes a antivirus that's good for nothing!!

 

[mediator]

I have original windows Xp all autopatched,updated,secured,maintained vigorously with all the pain since 1.6+ yrs! But still I say Windows sux! Yes I can do freely without windows! Infact I only visit Xp once a week to see if everything's in place so that rest of users dont have any problems!

Xp original -> took 2-3 yrs to call it actually stable and little secure!
Xp Antispyware -> was a joke to me! Spysweeper,adaware were much better!
Xp Firewall -> Duh uh?? Again a big joke, ZA fulfills all the needs and satisfies completely!
.
.
.
Endless list!

I guess the closed source software makers have some sorta technique to fool inncocent windows users. First MS make much expensive OS, then users cry of its security and stability, then comes the 3rd party dealers that make users happy and happy users waste time on maintaining the silly OS, then MS releases the spare parts i.e updates,patches in installments over the period like 2-4 yrs to make it actually stable and little secure too and then the window fanboys go gaga over it and finally stop crying and happily say it is stable and secure.


For having a full fledged Windows Vs Linux debate, please enter *www.thinkdigit.com/forum/showthread.php?p=320261#post320261 . Its a actual thread separated and recreated by @tech_for_future. All windows fanboys, Please radiate some patience. Please before entering the debate read carefully and slowly what has been posted throughout the topic. After reading every post please then reply freely and quote any one u like!

Common lets fight !

 

[readermaniax]

Gr8 News