coderunknown
Retired Forum Mod
Samsung announced 4 new Android based Galaxy mobile. these will fillup the mid & low section of the Android universe. these are: Galaxy Ace, Galaxy Fit, Galaxy Gio and Mini. all mayn't be available here but still a good news for Samsung fans & Android lovers. heres the official specs:
*www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01267b23.jpg
*www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01267b23fit.jpg
*www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01267b23gio.jpg
*www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01267b23mini.jpg
now before anyone starts praising Samsung for the new mobiles, do look at the screen size and than look at the resolution. and than express your opinions.
source: Source 1 & Source 2.
Heres what i feel:
Galaxy Ace: should be priced at 14-15k (else forget Ace & get Motorola Defy). but even then the resolution is low. way too low.it won't be wrong to say, Ace looks really good but only as long as it is turned off.
Galaxy Fit (3.31" @ 240X480): my mom's Nokia 2700Classic (2" display) have the same resolution. done.
Galaxy Gio: Galaxy 3's successor with better screen (320X480 @ 3.2", finally) & a fast 800Mhz processor, better WiFi (WiFi n) & HSDPA 7.2 Mbps. if priced at 13k, it'll be an excellent alternate to LG's Optimus One cause of its faster processor.
Galaxy Mini: no. not Galaxy 5's successor but more like a Galaxy 3's prototype. maybe it was the original Galaxy 3 but was put on halt cause of excellent screen for nobody, fixed focus camera & a low 1200mah battery.
BTW, the rest of the line comes with better Wifi, 1350Mah battery & Froyo (no gingerbread yet).
*www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01267b23.jpg
*www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01267b23fit.jpg
*www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01267b23gio.jpg
*www.blogcdn.com/www.engadget.com/media/2011/01/11x01267b23mini.jpg
now before anyone starts praising Samsung for the new mobiles, do look at the screen size and than look at the resolution. and than express your opinions.
source: Source 1 & Source 2.
Heres what i feel:
Galaxy Ace: should be priced at 14-15k (else forget Ace & get Motorola Defy). but even then the resolution is low. way too low.it won't be wrong to say, Ace looks really good but only as long as it is turned off.
Galaxy Fit (3.31" @ 240X480): my mom's Nokia 2700Classic (2" display) have the same resolution. done.
Galaxy Gio: Galaxy 3's successor with better screen (320X480 @ 3.2", finally) & a fast 800Mhz processor, better WiFi (WiFi n) & HSDPA 7.2 Mbps. if priced at 13k, it'll be an excellent alternate to LG's Optimus One cause of its faster processor.
Galaxy Mini: no. not Galaxy 5's successor but more like a Galaxy 3's prototype. maybe it was the original Galaxy 3 but was put on halt cause of excellent screen for nobody, fixed focus camera & a low 1200mah battery.
BTW, the rest of the line comes with better Wifi, 1350Mah battery & Froyo (no gingerbread yet).
