Yeah, no one is going to give them to you for free, so you don't have to worry about that. Buy a separate kitchen TV.freebird said:BTW:
I dont even want vista or mac even if anyone give it FREE. can use it as a kitchen TV
No, file-sharing and print sharing was not disabled. The security of macs were actually lowered. The mac is incredibly secure. No one could hack in to mac remotely. If it was a Windows machine, it would have been compromised a long ago.1) Yup, we don't know the reason why. Maybe file & print sharing was disabled cos if it was enabled then it sure would have been possible or something like that. Just assuming cos i was not there
That's one of the reasons. The other reason is that no one was able to hack in to mac remotely, and sending URLs via e-mail was allowed too. That's the second change in rules.2) They changed the rule cos no one there was able to hack.
I did a little reasearch about the hack, and here's how the hack works: the flaw that Dai Zovi exploited actually lies in the way Apple's QuickTime Media Player works with the Java programming language, according to Terri Forslof, manager of security response at 3Com's TippingPoint division, which put up the $10,000 prize. (Source)4) For your kind info, Quicktime plugin is loaded in Safari or all browsers in Mac automatically.
Even if I disable QuickTime, Flash will always be there, and sites like YouTube, Google Videos, etc. use Flash. I can experience multimedia experience without QuickTime, but I'll just miss a lot of multimedia contents.6) If u disable Quicktime plugin Safari then it will have 0 Multimedia capabilities in it.
mAV3 said:it is a matter of self pride and an elevation to an individuals rather insecure state of mind by saying that i use mac or linux ... coz windows being so widely used ppl feel its below their dignity to use it and those using it are considered to b fools for some absurd reason
freebird said:I dont even want vista or mac even if anyone give it FREE. can use it as a kitchen TV
aryayush said:Yeah, no one is going to give them to you for free, so you don't have to worry about that. Buy a separate kitchen TV.
I mentioned that I have no proof that it was enabled or disabled. Do you have a proof that it was not disabled? Plz provide source.No, file-sharing and print sharing was not disabled. The security of macs were actually lowered.
How what to say. If I know your IP address & got a backdoor in Mac obviously I can start a remote desktop session.The mac is incredibly secure. No one could hack in to mac remotely. If it was a Windows machine, it would have been compromised a long ago.
Isn't this how most of the Computers get hacked, like Windows. They get a mail with some malicious link which on clicking gives problems. So this is close to a real world sceneario.That's one of the reasons. The other reason is that no one was able to hack in to mac remotely, and sending URLs via e-mail was allowed too. That's the second change in rules.
Yup, bug in Apple Quicktime Media Player. How different it is then some bug in WMP with JAVA? I mean the player is flawed in both cases, so this doesn't makes the Mac automatically secure. You have it disabled, WIndows doesn't even comes with JAVA Runtime by default then considering that Windows is more secure with this flaw compared to Mac. There are many Mac users who have in enabled by default.the flaw that Dai Zovi exploited actually lies in the way Apple's QuickTime Media Player works with the Java programming language
No U cannot, Mac uses Quicktime engine to play mp3, midi or whatever embeded in Webpage not just Flash. You cannot experience lot, yes.I can experience multimedia experience without QuickTime, but I'll just miss a lot of multimedia contents.
R U kidding me, how can he understand this. He browses the internet without a browser. He works on Mac pro without running any application.mav3 said:dude y dont u understand for a fact that like the mac if u disable all the things u are saying the windows is also as secure in that case ...
Lolz....tooo good chote nawabZeeshan said:i bet he's not gonna buy a TV too , the Firmware used in the TV is not Open Source n the blueprints of all the components of the TV r not publicly accessible , there's no way he can use such a TV , sheesh
nepcker said:No, file-sharing and print sharing was not disabled. The security of macs were actually lowered. The mac is incredibly secure. No one could hack in to mac remotely. If it was a Windows machine, it would have been compromised a long ago.
That's one of the reasons. The other reason is that no one was able to hack in to mac remotely, and sending URLs via e-mail was allowed too. That's the second change in rules.
I did a little reasearch about the hack, and here's how the hack works: the flaw that Dai Zovi exploited actually lies in the way Apple's QuickTime Media Player works with the Java programming language, according to Terri Forslof, manager of security response at 3Com's TippingPoint division, which put up the $10,000 prize. (Source)
So, if you disable Java in Safari, you'll have no risk. Fortunately, I have it disabled. There are extremely limited no. of websites that use Java today, so this shouldn't be a problem. When you want Java, you can just re-enable it.
Even if I disable QuickTime, Flash will always be there, and sites like YouTube, Google Videos, etc. use Flash. I can experience multimedia experience without QuickTime, but I'll just miss a lot of multimedia contents.
But I don't think that I will ever disable Quick Time.
Actually it is not just about Java as in Java applets. It is also about Java as in JavaScript. Now If you disable JavaScript then almost 40-50% (a random number, don't hold it against me) of sites on internet will not work correctly for you...so it sucks but there is no defense for it either.nepcker said:I did a little reasearch about the hack, and here's how the hack works: the flaw that Dai Zovi exploited actually lies in the way Apple's QuickTime Media Player works with the Java programming language, according to Terri Forslof, manager of security response at 3Com's TippingPoint division, which put up the $10,000 prize. (Source)
So, if you disable Java in Safari, you'll have no risk. Fortunately, I have it disabled. There are extremely limited no. of websites that use Java today, so this shouldn't be a problem. When you want Java, you can just re-enable it.
AFAIK, and I might be wrong on this one, that hack is only for JAVA, not for JavaScript, which is completely different from JAVA.eddie said:Actually it is not just about Java as in Java applets. It is also about Java as in JavaScript. Now If you disable JavaScript then almost 40-50% (a random number, don't hold it against me) of sites on internet will not work correctly for you...so it sucks but there is no defense for it either.
You are wrong.aryayush said:AFAIK, and I might be wrong on this one, that hack is only for JAVA, not for JavaScript, which is completely different from JAVA.
Care to elaborate? What am I wrong about? That the hack is only for JAVA or that JavaScript is not the same as JAVA?eddie said:You are wrong.
he means the hack extends to java scriptaryayush said:Care to elaborate? What am I wrong about? That the hack is only for JAVA or that JavaScript is not the same as JAVA?
U seem to be an expert on hacking. Can u give step by step instructions on how to hack windows....i.e XP with latest updates? Also, I want to hack Microsoft site u know!nepcker said:You can indeed hack Windows without running any applications. It just needs to be on some network or connected to the internet. But this wasn't possible on Mac.