Windows XP Extensions Reflect Vista's Woes

Status
Not open for further replies.

gaurav_indian

CG Artist
Windows XP Extensions Reflect Vista's Woes

Microsoft needs to keep its older operating system on the market in order to appease business customers.

Microsoft in the past week announced yet another life extension for its supposedly retired Windows XP operating system, a sign that, despite almost two years on the market, Windows Vista is a no-go for most businesses.

Only 10% of 700 business executives recently surveyed by the Information Technology Industry Council and Sunbelt Software said their companies are using Windows Vista in the enterprise. The numbers are consistent with other industry data and anecdotal observations.


A survey released in October by the United Kingdom's Corporate IT Forum showed that only 4% of businesses in that country are using Windows Vista on workplace systems, while 35% said they were "not yet interested" in Vista. Fifty-eight percent said they were still using Windows XP, now 7 years old.

Meanwhile, IT officials for the state of Maine say their organization plans to skip Vista for state workers and will jump directly from XP to Windows 7, which Microsoft has said it plans to release in 2010.

Why such resistance to Vista? IT managers have complained about the operating system's resource requirements -- it takes considerably more PC horsepower and memory to run than XP -- and its lack of compatibility with older software. In particular, new security features built into Vista's kernel tend to break applications built for previous versions of Windows.

As a result, Microsoft is under considerable pressure from business customers to maintain XP's availability.

On Friday, the company said it's extending the deadline for Windows XP sales to custom PC builders.

Under the plan, system builders will be allowed to take delivery of XP licenses and media through May 30. Previously, Microsoft had announced a Jan. 31 XP cutoff date for system builders, which are typically smaller, build-to-order vendors. The news was first reported by InformationWeek.com sister site ChannelWeb.

It's the latest in a string of reprieves for XP. Microsoft also originally planned to stop distributing Windows XP media to large OEMs, like Dell and Hewlett-Packard, on Jan. 31. But the company announced in October that it would move that deadline to July 31.

If Microsoft is on schedule with Windows 7, that would leave a gap of about just six months between the end of the XP program in most markets and Windows 7's general availability in early 2010. It's a sign of Microsoft's concession that Vista has flopped in the key corporate marketplace.

*www.informationweek.com/news/windows/operatingsystems/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=212501862
 

sibot

I did it all for d n00ki3
Most companies in India are shifting to Vista for that matter of fact. Companies are purchasing better hardware that can support Vista. For how long will people drag on XP? Vista is far more capable, reliable and efficient OS.

The companies that refuse to move to Vista, are probably the small businesses that don't have enough financial resources to do so. Yes Vista demands better hardware, but the demand is overhyped by the media and tremendously over exaggerated. There is a reason to why there is more than one version of Vista, it is to streamline the OS with the requirements of one's PC.

And with the demand, the OS doesn't fail to deliver its best. I feel like I'm working on an outdated OS when I work on XP, the OS has been dragged way longer than its durable life.
 

x3060

A LOTR fan
its a huge money when talking about upgrade in corporate , and people dont prefer upgrade straight away.

well my friend is using vista since a month on athlon 64 2800 ,1g ram, its slow.

whatever it is, since MS has accepted the failure ,i strongly believe windows 7 will be a very good product :).
 

sibot

I did it all for d n00ki3
Vista delivered more than what I expected. People who undermine Vista, have probably:-

1. Never worked on it.
2. Heard about its heavy requirements from their fellow mates, and want to act like the cool guy techie guy who has his "own opinions".
3. Have worked on it, but don't know how to get their way around it.
4. Are Unwilling to accept change.
5. Have worked on it with systems that are not capable of running it.

Having said that, I used to be a HUGE XP fan boy before, I just did not like Vista at all, I had my reasons back then. But when I finally tried out Vista, it took me a month or so to get used to the new UI and soon enough I started to see what power the OS held beneath its skin. Vista is so capable, its a drunk power horse gone wild, if one knows how to get their way around it.

Yes it requires extra resources, but delivers the same too. Its been 8 years since XP released, if you expect an OS that was released today to run on a system you purchased 8 years back, thats absolute foolishness.

Regarding the upgrades in the corporate sector, I believe more than 70% of the corporate world has shifted to Vista. And the ones who haven't, would be forced to do so eventually, due to software compatibility issues. One reason some of our national banks are still running on 486's is because they just want anything that gets their work done. XP has the same fate.
 

chooza

Journeyman
Vista delivered more than what I expected. People who undermine Vista, have probably:-

1. Never worked on it.
2. Heard about its heavy requirements from their fellow mates, and want to act like the cool guy techie guy who has his "own opinions".
3. Have worked on it, but don't know how to get their way around it.
4. Are Unwilling to accept change.
5. Have worked on it with systems that are not capable of running it.

Having said that, I used to be a HUGE XP fan boy before, I just did not like Vista at all, I had my reasons back then. But when I finally tried out Vista, it took me a month or so to get used to the new UI and soon enough I started to see what power the OS held beneath its skin. Vista is so capable, its a drunk power horse gone wild, if one knows how to get their way around it.

Yes it requires extra resources, but delivers the same too. Its been 8 years since XP released, if you expect an OS that was released today to run on a system you purchased 8 years back, thats absolute foolishness.

Regarding the upgrades in the corporate sector, I believe more than 70% of the corporate world has shifted to Vista. And the ones who haven't, would be forced to do so eventually, due to software compatibility issues. One reason some of our national banks are still running on 486's is because they just want anything that gets their work done. XP has the same fate.

That's Bro. u striked a correct key. Here, in this forum, maximum are either newbie, or a kid.

XP can do whatever vista can and hence it doesn't force them to do the upgrade.
Had you ever compare the Security level of XP and Vista and also the parental control feature, or movie making, orr user level controls of Vista.....
 
Last edited:

Kl@w-24

Slideshow Bob
XP can do whatever vista can and hence it doesn't force them to do the upgrade.

Exactly. There are not enough compelling reasons to upgrade to Vista for the average Joe. Most, if not all, the benefits that Vista offers can be obtained through third-party apps in XP.

Now let's stick to the topic at hand otherwise things could get ugly. :|
 

chooza

Journeyman
Exactly. There are not enough compelling reasons to upgrade to Vista for the average Joe. Most, if not all, the benefits that Vista offers can be obtained through third-party apps in XP.

Now let's stick to the topic at hand otherwise things could get ugly. :|
If you are working on Office, pagemaker, U need only Windows 98 with 32 mb Ram.No need to upgrade to XP also.
 

Kl@w-24

Slideshow Bob
If you are working on Office, pagemaker, U need only Windows 98 with 32 mb Ram.No need to upgrade to XP also.

Windows 98 is dead. But this scenario does prevail in many small firms and offices. Thanks for pointing this out. ;) :D
 

x3060

A LOTR fan
flame wars, come on , lets end this.....
MS is not yours or mine, so why bother, if someone is not happy with it , let them be, if someone is happy with it; let them be too...
 

chooza

Journeyman
flame wars, come on , lets end this.....
MS is not yours or mine, so why bother, if someone is not happy with it , let them be, if someone is happy with it; let them be too...

True Bro. that what I say. Neither MS, Linux nor Apple OSX is ours, but people here are just into that war. Thats MS bashing. I think that their mindset is equal to virus writeer, ie to prove their supremcy.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom