So, is nVIDIA really ahead of ATI in terms of image quality? You gotta be kidding me. Anyway, here's are screenshots from Far Cry. As you can see, the 6800 renders half the trees with incorrect (without?) lighting.
(ATI)
*www.xbitlabs.com/misc/picture/?src=/images/video/farcry20b/ati_pier_sm20_bg.jpg&1=1
(nVIDIA)
*www.xbitlabs.com/misc/picture/?src=/images/video/farcry20b/nvidia_pier_sm30_bg.jpg&1=1
Plus, some 6800 GT owners will be quite shocked to find out that in CS : Source Beta, the Radeon 9600 XT (yes, 9600) almost matches the 6800 GT (and the Radeon 9800 XT beats it)! And that it at the most widely used resolution of 1024x768. And of course, let's not even talk about the dismal performance of the FX cards!
*www.firingsquad.com/hardware/geforce_fx_half-life2/page7.asp
So, I suggest the X800 series (either Pro or XT PE). Well, it may not have shader model 3.0 support, but the X800 can do almost everything that the 6800 can feature wise and obviously better peformance wise.
(ATI)
*www.xbitlabs.com/misc/picture/?src=/images/video/farcry20b/ati_pier_sm20_bg.jpg&1=1
(nVIDIA)
*www.xbitlabs.com/misc/picture/?src=/images/video/farcry20b/nvidia_pier_sm30_bg.jpg&1=1
Plus, some 6800 GT owners will be quite shocked to find out that in CS : Source Beta, the Radeon 9600 XT (yes, 9600) almost matches the 6800 GT (and the Radeon 9800 XT beats it)! And that it at the most widely used resolution of 1024x768. And of course, let's not even talk about the dismal performance of the FX cards!
*www.firingsquad.com/hardware/geforce_fx_half-life2/page7.asp
So, I suggest the X800 series (either Pro or XT PE). Well, it may not have shader model 3.0 support, but the X800 can do almost everything that the 6800 can feature wise and obviously better peformance wise.