ajaymailed
In the zone
i was wondering about the replacement of Athlon II X4, which are said to historically one of the most value for money CPUs. mainstream gamers loved it not only because of OCing potential but also low prices which could be
just when applications, games are really being programmed to take advantage of 4 or more cores, these budget quadcores are disappearing from the market.
AMD APUs have gr8 IGPs far ahead of Intel counterparts. But when it comes to CPU intensive applications, they hardly show any significant gains compared to Phenom. In some reviews/tests of CPU intensive applications, even Athlon II X4 is outperforming A6-3650.
Intel is going gr8 with Sandybridge and its tick-tock strategy, So i am guessing AMD will reduce the prices of its quad core APUs because even Core i3 is able to outperform many of them in CPU intensive tasks.
just when applications, games are really being programmed to take advantage of 4 or more cores, these budget quadcores are disappearing from the market.
AMD APUs have gr8 IGPs far ahead of Intel counterparts. But when it comes to CPU intensive applications, they hardly show any significant gains compared to Phenom. In some reviews/tests of CPU intensive applications, even Athlon II X4 is outperforming A6-3650.
Intel is going gr8 with Sandybridge and its tick-tock strategy, So i am guessing AMD will reduce the prices of its quad core APUs because even Core i3 is able to outperform many of them in CPU intensive tasks.