Unigine Heaven benchmark thread!

Jaskanwar Singh · Aug 8, 2011

*img192.imageshack.us/img192/2373/heaven0.jpg

Post your Unigine heaven Benchmark scores here.

Download the benchmark from here -
Download Heaven DX11 Benchmark | Unigine - advanced real-time 3D engine (for games and virtual reality systems)

Post a score screenshot and a GPU-Z screenshot too.
Download GPU-Z

SlashDK · Aug 9, 2011

*img546.imageshack.us/img546/3476/uniheavendx1119201080.jpg
*img269.imageshack.us/img269/8654/uniheavendx111600900.jpg

AMD Athlon ii x4 635 @ 3.1GHz
HD 6850 @ 825 Core and 1150 Memory
4GB DDR3 1333MHz 9-9-9-24

Jaskanwar Singh · Aug 10, 2011

@cybertonic
for some reason your cpu is not clocked to 3.1ghz during bench.

here is mine at 850/1300 GPU -
*img26.imageshack.us/img26/8194/capture5pq.png

at stock (800/1250) -
*img8.imageshack.us/img8/6881/capture2ikz.jpg
*img703.imageshack.us/img703/9303/capturepck.jpg

waiting for others to post.

SlashDK · Aug 10, 2011

I know there was some problem

. Otherwise I had OCed it to 3.1GHz using AMD Overdrive.

coderunknown · Aug 11, 2011

*i55.tinypic.com/x57aer.jpg
*gpuz.techpowerup.com/11/08/10/eps.png

Athlon II X4 625 @ 2.9Ghz.

Tessellation is really heavy on my GPU. disabling it makes the benchmark swift.

Rajesh345 · Aug 11, 2011

*img194.imageshack.us/img194/1521/readek.jpg
*gpuz.techpowerup.com/11/08/10/4hp.png
*img29.imageshack.us/img29/8555/defai.jpg

All settings max

*img11.imageshack.us/img11/6324/extbo.jpg

Tenida · Aug 12, 2011

Here's mine.

*i.imgur.com/qlPx4.png
*i.imgur.com/qycfg.png

rchi84 · Aug 13, 2011

Some results from my own testing:

1) Stock clocks (800/1250) in Ubuntu 11.04 x64 (yes, that is right, no typo):
*i52.tinypic.com/2nleirp.png

2) Stock clocks (800/1250) in Ubuntu 11.04 x64:
*i53.tinypic.com/11j277s.png

3) Stock clocks in Windows:
*i52.tinypic.com/16kxts3.png

4) OCed to 880/1375:
*i52.tinypic.com/mwy8oy.png

5) Oced and on extreme tessellation:
*i52.tinypic.com/25ujfh5.png

Jaskanwar Singh · Aug 13, 2011

nice scores guys. as you were uploading many results i added links to your posts and mentioned one of your best scores.

Skud · Aug 13, 2011

Also mention the Heaven version people are using. Scores may differ across versions.

Jaskanwar Singh · Aug 13, 2011

ok skud.
BTW your score?

Cilus · Aug 22, 2011

My setting:-
Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.2 GHz
Corsair XMS3 1600 MHz @ 9-9-9-24 @ 2T CR
HD 6870 Crossfire @ stock speed
Catalyst Control Center 11.7

Skud · Aug 22, 2011

Here's mine, all speeds are at stock. This one's tested earlier, so the driver is a bit older.

Jaskanwar Singh · Aug 22, 2011

Cilus said:
My setting:-
Phenom II X6 1090T @ 3.2 GHz
Corsair XMS3 1600 MHz @ 9-9-9-24 @ 2T CR
HD 6870 Crossfire @ stock speed
Catalyst Control Center 11.7

cilus i dont know but for some reason your fps are not upto the mark. you should have got much more.

Skud said:
Here's mine, all speeds are at stock. This one's tested earlier, so the driver is a bit older.

and yours too skud.
check pm.

vickybat · Aug 22, 2011

Unigine heaven seems to be favouring nvidia gpu's. Tenida's 560-ti has the fastest fps and highest scores yet and even a 6870cf couldn't beat it.
Or maybe because he has the fastest cpu.

I think tesselation is a factor here and even set to normal mode, it is favoring nvidia.
This benchmark stresses more on the compute power of the gpu i guess.
Cilus also has a 1090t which is no slouch. So i guess cpu doesn't mater that much here.

I will post my results soon but will get the least scores though. :sad:

Terabyte · Aug 22, 2011

Cilus is using an older version(2.1) and Skud's processor is a bottleneck, that's why the low scores.

vickybat · Aug 22, 2011

^^What about rchi84? His processor shouldn't be a bottleneck right?

Jaskanwar's scores are almost identical and that too with 16x AF. Rchi84 used 4x and that's why the tad higher scores.
So i don't think cpu matters that much here. Jaskanwar's x4 635 is more than enough for this test. Like i said, gpu's computational abilities are tested here.

I agree that skud's processor is underpowered here because it doesn't belong to this or even previous generation. If i'm not wrong, 69xx series have better tesselation performance than 68xx series.

Just my opinion and i could be wrong though.

Skud · Aug 22, 2011

Tenida's score is without AA. That may be the reason, mine is with 8xAA, so is Jas'. And this is one benchmark which is not so kind to AA.

Cilus' is using v2.1, so can't really comment about his scores.

I will put my score without AA.

vickybat · Aug 22, 2011

^^ Also post some scores with extreme tesselation. I will ask tenida to post his and with 8xaa with normal and extreme tess as well.

How did you enable aa ? I mean the settings has no aa in it. Did you override in catalyst control center?

Skud · Aug 22, 2011

AFAIR, it allows for selection of AA, AF, Tessellation etc. at the start in a small screen from where you launch the app. And regarding Extreme tess, at least in my case that's sort of useless, but let me find if some old results are saved.

Unigine Heaven benchmark thread!

Aspiring Novelist

MV VIP to the MAX

Aspiring Novelist

MV VIP to the MAX

Retired Forum Mod

Youngling

Gadget Freak

In the zone

Aspiring Novelist

Super Moderator

Aspiring Novelist

laborare est orare

Super Moderator

Aspiring Novelist

I am the night...I am...

In the zone

I am the night...I am...

Super Moderator

I am the night...I am...

Super Moderator