infra_red_dude said:
@ amd64_man2005 and @aryayush
stop fighting you two! you both are half correct.
Half correct! Not even by a long shot. I am fully correct and he is entirely wrong.
infra_red_dude said:
it is also correct to say that w960i (and others like w710, w580 etc.) has accelerometer.
No, it isn't.
infra_red_dude said:
but it is incorrect to say that ONLY the iphone has accelerator
Yes, it is because ever car I've seen has one and the iPhone has none.
But it is not incorrect to say that
only the Apple iPhone has an accelerometer that senses the phone's position and adjusts the screen orientation automatically according to it.
Only the iPhone has it.
amd64_man2005 said:
Yeah, I did.
amd64_man2005 said:
the accellearator is a feature of the sont phones and not of iphone..
What is an "accellearator"? All I know is that the accelerometer is a patented and exclusive feature of the iPhone and no other phone in the world has it.
amd64_man2005 said:
and ya by the way evn k800 is a 256k color phn..hw cum its screen is bttr than the w550..
Because it has a larger size and resolution.
amd64_man2005 said:
it doent matte ron the colour mr
Oh really? Which is better: black and white or grayscale? 4K colours or 65K? 262K or 16M? You've no clue.
amd64_man2005 said:
...just go thru su bio buks and then giv ur opinion...i dunno y peaple with no knowledge watsoevr crop up and start praising sumthin like nething...stop being a loser and grow up...
Oh WOW, you typed some rude words and ended the post by calling me a loser. Such a cool person.
Just being unnecessarily rude to someone does not help you in the least. When you have little idea about something, try to learn from those who know better than you. If you do not trust someone's opinion, ask a third person or fourth. Have an open mind.
I dare you to bring me any evidence from a reliable source that proves even a single thing that I've typed in this post wrong. I ask the forum members here - am I wrong? Do SE phones have accelerometers? Doesn't the iPhone have one? Aren't screens with 16M colours better than 262K and 65K screens? Isn't the human eye capable of seeing more than 32M colours?