Should Bush be hanged?
- Thread starter tanmoy_rajguru2005
- Start date
-
- Tags
- bush comment guys hangedor maskilling
- Status
G
gxsaurav
Guest
they can invade India, but the resistance will be more then Iraq or Afgan, cos here, even our army is more then US army in quantity...& don't forget the gurilla war method usually we indians follow
Arsenal_Gunners
Human Spambot
Yes we are experts in gurilla war by living in jungalraj for many yearsgxsaurav said:
kumarmohit
Technomancer
Well Guyz Like it it or not Bush is a democratically elected Leader & all his acts have to be sanctioned by the US Congress. The best slap in his mouth will be a defeat in Presidential elections to him and his party. He cant act smart for long now that the US Congress is dominated by the Democrats.
BTW America in its right mind will not invade India coz Its trying to use India to hold off the Chinese, Attack India and its power will become too weak, enough for for the Chinese to interfere and have a field day.
BTW America in its right mind will not invade India coz Its trying to use India to hold off the Chinese, Attack India and its power will become too weak, enough for for the Chinese to interfere and have a field day.
OP
tanmoy_rajguru2005
Journeyman
YP. Indian common ppl r not so experiened with WAR and GUN like Iraq or Afganistan.But our military power is quite strong. So if US wants to destroy India it ll make them so weak that they will not be the superpower anymore.shakshy said:
Aberforth
The Internationalist
harmu.com said:
It goes to show one thing. Put a flag saying Al Qaeda in the anaconda inhabited Amazon forests and US forces will rush there in the blink of an eye.
gxsaurav said:
Guerrilla warfare tactics were mastered by the Viets and Talibans but how do they come to use when your enemy drops bombs on top of your heads and your guerrilla tactics won't reach up to the sky.....? India's superior armed forces lose more AF pilots in peacetime accidents than US does in wartime.
mAV3 said:
The nuclear warheads India possesses would not be able to harm US or its close favorites like NATO countries. Moreover our missiles don't have the range to carry nuclear warheads so far as to affect US mainland. If US really wants to fight war with India there is no stopping as it is militarily much sophisticated, has got very powerful surveillance and not to talk about its economic power - all three are essential to win a war.
By the way I think Bush should be tried for war crimes for leading US to devastation of a civilization in Iraq without concrete justification or proof, violating Geneva Conventions on treatment of prisoners or war, violation International Code of Human Rights, trivalising crimes by the US Army against Iraqi innocents, making a mockery of justice by using a Kangaroo court with inexperienced persecutors to put Saddam to trial. Also for its unashamed support when Israel rollers in Beirut a la medieval imperialist style for one kidnapped soldier - a shame to human civilization.
India won't be in danger of US attacks so soon seeing a lot of US economy is dependent on India, India has technological prowess to disable or at least hamper US intelligence, India is a large market for US products (largest outside of US) and is a completely democratic country which would cause furore over the world if India is attacked. The fact is no two proper democracies have ever gone to war.
G
gxsaurav
Guest
nah, if they want they can invade india saying that the Gandhi Family is ruling india from 50 years which is a dictatorship
But yeah, right now, i see india as another Iraq in the making. India is a big market, at one time iraq was also a big market for USA. They sold iraq weapons, well...they are giving us the weapon technology too.....for what, protection against war or pakistan, to hell with war can't they work on to create better bussiness relations with them
General public doesn't care what the boss of lashkar said about Manmohan singh, only the politicians care for it cos it is their job to care & make an issue. General public cares for low price of Rice & Wheat first, or better yet, availability of water & electricity.
People say india is developing, ya right, Making 100 malls in gurgaon or Noida or availability of International brands in india such as ipod, Laptops, cars, honda bikes doesn't mean a developing country when we don't even get proper water supply in Delhi & mumbai, or better yet...proper sanitation & sewage system
woops...silghtly went off topic here
But yeah, right now, i see india as another Iraq in the making. India is a big market, at one time iraq was also a big market for USA. They sold iraq weapons, well...they are giving us the weapon technology too.....for what, protection against war or pakistan, to hell with war can't they work on to create better bussiness relations with them
General public doesn't care what the boss of lashkar said about Manmohan singh, only the politicians care for it cos it is their job to care & make an issue. General public cares for low price of Rice & Wheat first, or better yet, availability of water & electricity.
People say india is developing, ya right, Making 100 malls in gurgaon or Noida or availability of International brands in india such as ipod, Laptops, cars, honda bikes doesn't mean a developing country when we don't even get proper water supply in Delhi & mumbai, or better yet...proper sanitation & sewage system
woops...silghtly went off topic here
Aberforth
The Internationalist
India is still in better colour in the world than Iraq was, because Indian government isn't formed by an dictator who captured the country by force like Saddam did. India has much better standing, position, influence...I know India is a crap but US can't just hit India and get away easily at least for the next few decades. The day US uses India to fight a war against somebody will be the day we should really be worried of 'disposal' of India after the war.
Today Bush justified Saddam's removal of a dictator but where was the dictator tag when US used him to destroy and kill Ayatollah Khomeini's Iranian soldiers? And what about Saudi Arabia where killings, missings, torture under the dictator royal family beats Saddam's records exponentially? Did someone say oil politics.....?
Today Bush justified Saddam's removal of a dictator but where was the dictator tag when US used him to destroy and kill Ayatollah Khomeini's Iranian soldiers? And what about Saudi Arabia where killings, missings, torture under the dictator royal family beats Saddam's records exponentially? Did someone say oil politics.....?
Arsenal_Gunners
Human Spambot
how would you like m1a1 abrams tanks passing right infront of your door
Aberforth
The Internationalist
mAV3 said:
Not at all. I don't allow my judgements to be based on TV news. Media is designed so that it feeds what the audience wants not what is the truth. To find the truth you have to dig in libraries, walk and extra mile, search out old records, find out who did what in all these 29 years and come to the final conclusion. I think not all people base their choices on celebrity endorsements and opinions in TV shows.
shakshy
Broken In
^^ its not about scarred, its only about the possibility that may arise a decade so. Bush, seeing india as their potential market is getting the best from it at present[/a]. After it, when india grows powerful for instance develops nuke weapons, he will term it as a threat to US or as uprise of terrorism. Then he will do the same he has done with iraq. Then gradually get hold of india and take what ever we hav got
- Status