What the **** is wrong with you?
WOW, that was uncalled for. He wasn't being sarcastic. It really is weird that Safari has those more advanced options and even the Undo option but it does not work (while those others work like charms).
He was absolutely not being sarcastic. Read his reply again and you'll see.![]()
Safari does use a lot of RAM. No doubt about that. (But I have 2GB to throw around, so I don't really care as long as it is slick and fast.)Ok now, I just found a problem. In firefox, with arnd 25 addons running, I have firefox taking 75 MB.
Safari which came with the default package and without installing anything else takes 140 MB on windows vista. I am not blaming windows or safari here. I dont want to go down that road. I realize there is a separate thread.
but, I think this may be a little too much for a browser with just 1 tab opened?
Isn't it weird that a browser can restore entire sessions if it crashes but cannot restore a tab you just accidentally closed?
Okay peace time. Chill it. Have some lime juice or roasted peanuts. The last thing we want is a certain dr coming in here and giving us a 2 day shameful misery thing (hint! hint!)What the **** is wrong with me? Who the **** do you think you are to talk to me in that manner? What gives you that right? That was sarcasm, and you're shi**** me if you claim so otherwise. It's weird that Safari has that feature? Oh, yeah, it's totally, genuinely and non-sarcastically weird, let's call Ripley and ask him to include that. The only way you could have been more ******* obvious is if you would have said ,"Oh yeah, I'm going to be sarcastic now".
I realize he is your friend Aayush, but blindly supporting someone is something I would not expect of you. Either that, or either you have lost all fluency over English that I assume you possess.
And pray tell me, what was uncalled for? My reply sounded far more polite than the post that incited it.
Nooooo! I don't remember ever posing nude on the net!Your wally just came in front of my eyes.
Nooooo! I don't remember ever posing nude on the net!
Nooooo! I don't remember ever posing nude on the net!
Thank you!Now that you put it that way, it is weird.
Exactly. And when you misinterpret a clearly worded post (which no one else has a problem with, mind you) and then ignore other people when they try to clear out the confusion for you, it's you who isn't "communicating properly".Let this be a lesson to us all, communicating properly is essential on the forums!
How's this, for instance:But I still don't see where I was rude!
Don't say Milind started it, because he was within his rights to be annoyed when you started a tirade about a harmless post (in which he was actually accepting weird behaviour of his favourite browser).What the **** is wrong with me? Who the **** do you think you are to talk to me in that manner? What gives you that right? That was sarcasm, and you're shi**** me if you claim so otherwise. It's weird that Safari has that feature? Oh, yeah, it's totally, genuinely and non-sarcastically weird, let's call Ripley and ask him to include that. The only way you could have been more ******* obvious is if you would have said ,"Oh yeah, I'm going to be sarcastic now".
I'm all for it, but I think you should have apologised for your mistake. Or, at the very least, accepted it. Instead, you chose to end it with a cautionary note to everyone that we should all communicate properly. Guess what, everyone else was.nm... let peace prevail *sips lime juice*
This is really funny. Everyone is annoyed coz he thinks he is right and the other one just doesn't understand and is cribbing. And to most of them, asking "what the **** is your problem" for a genuine misunderstanding (on ring_wrath's part) with carefully laid words (even though he has misinterpreted what goobimama has told) need not have such a reply.Don't say Milind started it, because he was within his rights to be annoyed when you started a tirade about a harmless post (in which he was actually accepting weird behaviour of his favourite browser).