All the feel good about Nokia is alright but dont forget the negatives. Eg. Why would Nokia always give subpar specced handsets? The explanation that it is enough does not hold water because that severely limits future upgradability.
And what about the practice of putting selected features into selected handset models but never producing a single model that has it all? Or not having a linearly additive feature set along the price range?
care to elaborate??
Case in the point N97. Inadequate internal memory preventing much needed software updates.
N8. As much beautiful as it was it could not get full OS updates and had to do with lite versions due to limited internal memory.
The CPU too could be considered a step below par because it did not have much reserve power.
SeriouslyRumored specs for the Nokia Normandy include Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 SoC, 4” FWVGA, 5MP camera, and Android 4.4.1 KitKat. The low-cost smartphone is tipped for a launch during MWC 2014 next month in Barcelona.
Engineering prototype of Nokia Normandy leaks in a live photo - GSMArena.com news
Rumored specs for the Nokia Normandy include Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 SoC, 4” FWVGA, 5MP camera, and Android 4.4.1 KitKat. The low-cost smartphone is tipped for a launch during MWC 2014 next month in Barcelona.
If its going to replace Asha series, then it would great, with price of 7-8k........
What if it is not Android but just Series 40 evolution that looks like that?
Even if it did turn out to be Android, it may just be following the pattern at Nokia - N9, 808 and then this Normandy