izzikio_rage
Technomancer
I am planning to buy a AMD rig but am confused between the msi rs482 and the nvidia 6100 . I am pretty interested in games and plan to use the onboard graphics only. Please suggest
It should be noted that NVIDIA’s new integrated chipsets are undoubtedly preferable to ATI’s Radeon Xpress 200 not only because the GeForce 6150 and GeForce 6100 are slightly faster in a majority of applications, but also because they offer a much wider functionality.
Re-benching the ATI RS482 did not suddenly move the ATI chipset to the front in performance, but it does demonstrate that the ATI RS482 and the NVIDIA GeForce 6100 perform about the same in most benchmarks. The performance is certainly close enough that OEM's will have no overriding reason to choose one or the other chipsets based on a performance advantage. The good news is that buyers can choose either solution based on price or features and get pretty comparable results. NVIDIA has closed the integrated graphics performance gap, but they haven't surged ahead as many expected.
gxsaurav said:performance & fearure wise Geforce is better as it also gor purevideo, & since it's onboard it cannot be overclocked
izzikio_rage said:Thanks Guys ! by the way what are the price difference of the two ? and could you name some good companies for the 6100 ?
izzikio_rage said:Thanks Guys ! by the way what are the price difference of the two ? and could you name some good companies for the 6100 ?
izzikio_rage said:I did plan to wait for the 6150 but there is always something better round the corner