Hello guys!!
after posting the thread, I kept out of the thread, to avoid any inflammation to be caused and members calling 'names' each other, Luckily,moderator (Krow) intervened cleaned (I haven't seen that posts).. for this I thank him...
For my part. I voted that 'NO' because negative campaign always backfire...however I also admit* 'Sarath' is correctly saying.'
But it will not work on anyone involved in this discussion since we are never the target audience in the first place. and are well versed with the actual facts to be influence by it.
A majority of people do not give much thought into the accuracy of the source. This is rampant in todays world. Hence a lot of such strategies work. Luckily since both MS and Google are big corporations, such adverts are hardly going to take the other off-line overnight.
Some how this thread change to 'usual 'Linux Vs Windows War.
Let us come to the topic..
the main question here is whether big business corporation like M$ can resort to,' bad mouthing its competitor's products ?
Supporters of M$ say,'that it is a corporation. so it can!"
In USA it can get away with such tactics, because where the politicians are receiving contributory fund (read 'bribe') from BIG corporations such as M$ and apple and ready to bend rules for them..But in India and Europe and many parts of worlds it is a offence to receive funds from the business concerns to promote their interests (see the 2 G scam here)
using unethical practices is not new to them..
they are now desperate.. even offering apple employees to quit their jobsMicrosoft luring developers from Apple with more cash - Yahoo! News
they were caught red handed by offering laptops to journalists when Vista was released
How about Amazon and Google employees?
we can summed up,
Microsoft has certainly had considerable success playing the "money card":
- Offering discounts on software to those who "only" sell computers loaded with Windows (and previously, threatening to use their MONEY-fueled legal dept. to attack those who sell computers NOT loaded with a Microsoft OS).
- Using money as a lever to force the OLPC project to load WinXP on XO computers (and push the "Sugar" Linux OS to the back burner).
- Nearly giving away XP licenses to netbook manufacturers who "only" load XP on netbooks (to try and push Linux out of the picture).
- Constantly threatening others (companies, competitors) to sue them out of existence with their money-stuffed legal department.
- Greasing palms of Governments, Health care organizations, school boards, and so forth in exchange for lucrative and exclusive IT contracts.
- and even bribing ISO members (and paying others to become ISO members) just to ram its ridiculous OOXML "standard" through the hoops.
we are not shocked.. thank U BIG 'Ballmere" Cann't U teach our politico 'proper course on bribery" so they wouldn't be in jail ?