Latest Hardware Prices & Quotes..!!
160 GB Seagate SATA II 7200.10 HDD - 1,500 Rs in Bangalore. So sweet
So it seems the fast Seagate 7200.10 single platter 250 GB should also have become cheaper. ( which was ~Rs.2800/-)
phuchungbhutia
Om Ma Ni Pä Me Hum
.I hav Amd 3200 on Asus A8v Mx i want to upgrade to probably Am2 with better motherboard that supports ddr2 with integrated graphics . . .please can anyone quote some price and options for upgrade.. i d upgrade slowly starting with mb . . Ram and procy ... So on... Please suggest me...ps hav financial constraints . If good price will go all in . . .1 GB DDR2 for 0.9k ?
man, thats expensive
Single 2 GB stick will cost 1,500 (Dynet) or 1,650 (Transcend)
Still, try to avoid Dynet.
ramsingh
Journeyman
just purchases : MSI 9600GT 512 Mb--- Rs.10100
Abit IP35E- Rs. 5300
was going 2 buy Intel Core 2 Quad 6600(2.4 Ghz)---Rs. 10,500 but the dealer pissed me off.. waited for 1/2 hr for the proccsr// nd when he bought it from some other shop. it was of Nov-2007 and the seal was slightly scratched.. so disint buy..
what is d curremt price of Q 6600 in Pune.. should i buy it from here(kolkata)nd take 2 pune?
Regarding ram is there any appreciable difference in Corsair value ram and Corsair XMS ram...??should i opt for value ram..
Abit IP35E- Rs. 5300
was going 2 buy Intel Core 2 Quad 6600(2.4 Ghz)---Rs. 10,500 but the dealer pissed me off.. waited for 1/2 hr for the proccsr// nd when he bought it from some other shop. it was of Nov-2007 and the seal was slightly scratched.. so disint buy..
what is d curremt price of Q 6600 in Pune.. should i buy it from here(kolkata)nd take 2 pune?
Regarding ram is there any appreciable difference in Corsair value ram and Corsair XMS ram...??should i opt for value ram..
dOm1naTOr
Wise Old Owl
here Corsair 1G 667 is for 900~ 950
nd transcent 667 1G for 850.
single module will be having better bang for the buck, coz now 2GB is getting the mainstream..nd noones seems to care bout setting dual channel.
Actually 2*667 1G in dual channel is way better than 2G DDR2 800
nd transcent 667 1G for 850.
single module will be having better bang for the buck, coz now 2GB is getting the mainstream..nd noones seems to care bout setting dual channel.
Actually 2*667 1G in dual channel is way better than 2G DDR2 800
keith_j_snyder2
Rising ApocalypsE
Value RAM is just the basic ram but if u want something more like gaming RAM then XMS2 is where u can stand. Besides XMS2 modules comes in dual setup so their compatibility is much better compared to value series.
Also XMS2 are better when it comes to overclocking too.
infra_red_dude
Wire muncher!
Errr.. not exactly. Dual channel doesn't mean 2*Speed. But Dual Channel means a broader pathway.
Lemme try to explain it this way:
Consider that 40kg of load is to be transported by 2 cars, each hafing capacity of carrying 20kg load (arbitrary). Car1 runs at 800kmph and Car 2 at 667kmph.
In single channel, only one car can run at a time. So Car1 carries 20kg at a time running at a speed of 800kmph. Then does it for the second time.
In dual channel, both cars can run simultaneously. But the speed of both the cars (Car2) is only 667kmph (as compared to 800kmph for Car1). So both cars can carry 20kgs and run together, albeit at a lower speed.
I hope the single/dual channel confusion is cleared
axxo
99.9% Idle
Errr.. not exactly. Dual channel doesn't mean 2*Speed. But Dual Channel means a broader pathway.
Lemme try to explain it this way:
Consider that 40kg of load is to be transported by 2 cars, each hafing capacity of carrying 20kg load (arbitrary). Car1 runs at 800kmph and Car 2 at 667kmph.
In single channel, only one car can run at a time. So Car1 carries 20kg at a time running at a speed of 800kmph. Then does it for the second time.
In dual channel, both cars can run simultaneously. But the speed of both the cars (Car2) is only 667kmph (as compared to 800kmph for Car1). So both cars can carry 20kgs and run together, albeit at a lower speed.
I hope the single/dual channel confusion is cleared
what happens if anyone car runs out of fuel??
Errr.. not exactly. Dual channel doesn't mean 2*Speed. But Dual Channel means a broader pathway.
Lemme try to explain it this way:
Consider that 40kg of load is to be transported by 2 cars, each hafing capacity of carrying 20kg load (arbitrary). Car1 runs at 800kmph and Car 2 at 667kmph.
In single channel, only one car can run at a time. So Car1 carries 20kg at a time running at a speed of 800kmph. Then does it for the second time.
In dual channel, both cars can run simultaneously. But the speed of both the cars (Car2) is only 667kmph (as compared to 800kmph for Car1). So both cars can carry 20kgs and run together, albeit at a lower speed.
I hope the single/dual channel confusion is cleared
thanks for correcting me. ..i think thats equivalent to what i said if the data is distributable . . in this example of load. . if the 40kg can be split into 2*20kg and 2 cars run at the same time , its equivalent to one car carrying 20kg at twice the speed , rite ?
aneesh kalra
Mclaren F1 Long tail
My latest acquisition is Seagate Barracuda 160 GB SATA drive for RS 1750, is this too, this was the cheapest quote which I got from Computer Empire, Nehru Place. How much does an equivalent WD(WesternDigital) drive cost and is it better performance wise ?
infra_red_dude
Wire muncher!
Not exactly, the load sharing e.g was just given to simplify things. The bandwidth (capacity) of both differs. So practically if the load carrying capacity of 800kmph car is 20kg then for 667kmph car its 15kg (thats what the 5300 in PC-5300 for DDR2 667 and 6400 in PC-6400 for DDR2 800 represent
)