kamal hasan or sharukh khan

Status
Not open for further replies.

confused!!

It's true Im not confused
We should not compare one language actor to another language actor or for the fact one generation actor to other generation actor ...because most of the people would'nt have seen regional films and so it would be hard to compare both of them..but whatever i have seen i found Kamal Hasan more diversified:)
 

Dipen01

Youngling
My all time fav. Kamal Hassan film is Pushpak :p he is hilarious in it..

Sadma was good too ;)

But i still enjoy SRK's movie more than Hassan's
 

PcEnthu

Linux Learner
Kamal Hasan for sure. He is the most versatile actor. I still admire the short guy role he performed in 'Aboorva sahodharargal' in a time where technology was of little help to the film industry.
And in the recent films, i like 'Anbe sivam'. The contrast between the two characters he performed in that film can be done only by him
 

ancientrites

In the zone
hey guys did any one see kamal hasan "Hey Ram" kamal hasan does some cool stunts.speaking about the stunts first one kh is playing piano and below rani mukherjee doing something else and second one kH bites one side of rani butts.that was hillarious and i will never forget.:mrgreen:
 

legolas

Padawan
^Yes!I felt it is a communism promotion that he got in that movie :D IIRC!
:) Yeah right!! its a pity its not another movie where the hero likes a girl (heroine) and his brother/father is a rowdy and hero slays or subdues the whole gang single-handed (ly) and then gets the heroine.
btw, I hope you are not telling it was to promote his support or alliance towards any political parties?? :p
 

PcEnthu

Linux Learner
@pcenthu:anbe shivam is a commie's promo movie :evil:

A part of the film may be thought of in that aspect, but that doesn't cloud the theme of the movie and the performance of the actor

Offtopic: The communism he preaches in the movie isn't in the wrong direction
 

Roadripper

Journeyman
We should not compare one language actor to another language actor or for the fact one generation actor to other generation actor ...because most of the people would'nt have seen regional films and so it would be hard to compare both of them..but whatever i have seen i found Kamal Hasan more diversified:)

+1 for this,,..f or me its SRk al the way ....:rolleyes::rolleyes:
 

praka123

left this forum longback
Tamil films(those by good directors) are bit more expressive than any other Indian language :| .while,SRK films/Hindi films shows as if India as a place where everyone wear Western dressings :D !

also,hindi films-no story nothing unusual except a few handful of movies :| while Tamil films are full of experimentation with new heroes/heroines ,gfx effects to story telling way :)

while Hindi films basically are assuming all are Punjabi's(no offense),which is a wrong assumption.
I feel pity for some south side guys esp west of karnataka(manglore belt) where all small theatres play those crappy hindi movies :rolleyes:
we have better films made in other languages rather than Hindi or telegu.

SRK,ofcourse is good in his earlier films until "yes boss" .after that it is the same story....
 

iceman69

Lost In The Silicon Woods
Well, I cant say ive seen many films starring kamal hassan. A few, but not many. But though I dont speak Tamil, the films i did see, I really liked. Growing up, for a long time one of my favourite films had been Appu Raja. But few films of his really made an impression:
1- Dayavaan (based on the godfather), I think it was included in time's list of best hundered films ever too.
2- The film on which the hindi film virasat is based. dont remember the name.
3- One of all time favourites, regardless of language - Pushpak. It was a silent film.

One thing i like about Kamal is his versatlity and willingness to experiment. He and amir khan are similar ni that way.

That said, its not correct to campare two actors from different streams, because there is no common benchmark to test against. Ive read a lot of bias in some of the posts above, and a lot of ignorance in others.
Praka says in one of his posts:"SRK is where common man who are construction workers or poor ppl from north india who feels Shahrukh as one of them". Nothing could be further from the truth. Shahrukh is actually a middle, upper class & NRI hero. Its those audiences he targets with his movies. He's a smart man and knows how to sell himself as a brand.
Now, im nor defending shah rukh. In fact i personally dislike his movies vehemently. He cant act to save his life and sticks to a definite formula. But i admire him for reaching the top spot in a ruthless industry without any support. Even Mr Bachhan cant say that.[sorry big B].

All that apart, if posts and comments are made, some intelligent ones would be welcome. i'll particularly point out Praka as a case in point where his comments are extremely biased, and/or ignorant of the matter at hand, to say nothing of the negativity almost dripping from them. No offence intended mate, but it dosent hav to be North India vs South Indian all the time.

Bout the topic, as far as movies are concerned, KH beats SRK any day any time. :)
 

mahesh

naughty boy :) :)
Kamala Hasan know only over romantic scenes...just stupid sometimes. Other times he seems pretending to be serious. Is dat acting???????????



can u say any kamal film in which he acted over romantic scenes?????????????
 
Last edited:

praka123

left this forum longback
something better like Srinivasan vs nanapatekar or kamal vs om puri will be better.SRK is nowhere near acting when compared to kamil. :D

@ iceman69: well ,it is what is my perception. count hrithik or abhishek bachan as upper class or nri hero :rolleyes: .and I said SRK as common workers class hero NOT in a negative sense ;instead it is the common man who watches movie in theatre who made SRK a hero!.
 

napster007

Padawan
Sk sux big time if it come to acting....its just the looks that he's got. KH will strip him top to bottom in acting!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom