why reviewers including digit doesn't mention sar value and mention it as a negative point for the ones with high sar values?
I prefer to buy samsung smartphones since they are mostly low on sar values at-least in a few mid range ones. Also they put their antennas in the bottom in most of their android phones, thats why you see many sar values mentioned on samsung handsets have sar value low on the head result and high on body (Note 3> 0.29W/kg (head) 0.36W/kg (body). Also samsung is made out of plastic, which helps the antennas compared to metal ones. Yes, many will be boiling over since i mentioned Samsung in a positive way, I agree with you its hardware is not as durable as many, UI is heavy and its plastic. Still even my next handset will most possibly be an Samsung, cause sar values, handset being light is more important to me than a feel of metal.
I prefer to buy samsung smartphones since they are mostly low on sar values at-least in a few mid range ones. Also they put their antennas in the bottom in most of their android phones, thats why you see many sar values mentioned on samsung handsets have sar value low on the head result and high on body (Note 3> 0.29W/kg (head) 0.36W/kg (body). Also samsung is made out of plastic, which helps the antennas compared to metal ones. Yes, many will be boiling over since i mentioned Samsung in a positive way, I agree with you its hardware is not as durable as many, UI is heavy and its plastic. Still even my next handset will most possibly be an Samsung, cause sar values, handset being light is more important to me than a feel of metal.