kirangp said:@aryayush
U tell about stability...IN MAC OS hardly there will be few applications available for a particular job & most created by Apple..But in Windows there will be hundreds & there in lies the problem...All these programs are not created by Microsoft..all r created by 3rd party developers with all registry entries,files & the more number of programs u have less is the performance
And dude tell me one thing...who will receive the most number of curses,hatemails for not playin well in cricket...will it be Virender Sehwag or some Ranji Player?? Obviously Sehwag...& that here is MS...The more the popular the more r the number of attacks in the form of viruses,exploits etc...And yeah even MACs r also gettin their share 2... hackers & virus writers dont have time for Mac where the usage is just 2-3 % of the market...They can utilize themselves better if they write it for Windows..They can spread the treachery better in Windows..I agree that Microsoft was a bit leniant on the security side 2 but still Apple also is & they only find out the vulnerabilities themselves & patch it up whereas MS are told by hackers about the vulnerabilities & after gettin screwed they patch it up..
And talkin about MAC updates....every 0.1 version revision Apple charges 129$.. from CHeetah,Puma,Jaguar,Tiger & the upcoming Leopard its the same story...ANd dont tell me that they offer value for money for all these upgrades...most of them will be just enhancements...And the best parts of Tiger that is Spotlight,Dashboard were rip offs of Alpha builds of Longhorn...So it comes nearly 400-500 dollars which is the same cost of Windows Vista & whatever new features we get,we wont be payin anything for that...
To tell u the truth Microsoft is a victim of popularity of its own operating systems...By the time they release a new OS the previous OS wud have been adopted by users that they dont feel like upgrading to a new one..But they do upgrade...Now Windows Xp is defacto,but people were whinning that it didnt offer new noticeable features but people still upgraded..
And as everybody has said...PC upgradation which cant be done with MACS..Yes ys I know MAC systems look like angels but PC can be made to look like that...I have seen some beautiful lookin cabinets...
So what i tell is if u like MACs gud for ya & I like Windows & wud not think of switching to MAC rite now..Windows is just gettin better...And I am with Remond based MS & support them whole heartedly
In the end also I am tellin that MS is also a pain in the arse but still Apple is not far ahead...But MS will catch it...
Make a badware for Windows and you get applause. Make one for *nix and teri maa ki, teri behan ki
What exactly is futureproof? I you may please let me know. Do you mean going out and buying something you may never need and call it future proof?BTW, mac desktops/lappys are futureproof.
They follow the rule "Great (forgot the original word here) software companies should design their own hardware"
SE><IE said:Man! do you seriously think UNIX like/based architecture is far more superior than Windows? Don't live in the dreams dude. I made a point somewhere
No, I'm not a badware developer but you can always get opinion of some at security forums.
Viruses DO exist for *ix platform too and it has already been proved that even it is vulnerable. A software is made by humans and the developers of Apple's OS aren't God (sorry almighty for pulling you in this thread).
What exactly is futureproof? I you may please let me know. Do you mean going out and buying something you may never need and call it future proof?
I guess Linux developer force is doing a great Job by promoting freedom of choice in softwares. MS is doing the same for Hardware atleast. What about Apple? Freedom of choice is a birthright
True, you don't wait for service packs or don't have compatibility issues because Macs support handpicked hardware.
When you say "MS is evil" about the closed-source issue. Where does Apple stand then? Even their boxes are "sealed"
C'mon speak up.
s18000rpm said:ya me too didnt understand the "Future Proof" part
for example, in PC's, take Intel's 965 series m/b, they support from P4 based to Core 2 Quad processors - now this is "Future Proof" .
so for more advanced & demanding Softwares (which may launch after 3-4 years), i can upgrade my Proccy. & go back to work
give an example for Mac
caleb said:I'm not against Mac but if Windows or Mac or anyone for that matter claims that their product is future proof than it just a bunch of baloney. But Mac's biggest drawback is their pricing...it is too expensive for the ordinary computing Indian to buy a Mac at their present pricing structure. But if they drop their prices to suit Indina market than there will be much more popular plus it will also give Windows a run for their money...hey maybe windows too would than have to drop the prices.
aryayush said:And Apple does not deal in extremely low end configurations.But if you want a good, stable machine for doing your stuff and can at least spend Rs. 50,000 and upwards, Macs are your best bet.
ambandla said:HAHA. what? copy from longhorn. this is the funniest comment I ever heard. Even Bill Gates will laugh and laugh if he hears this.
Ya, u r right.....can u upgrade the CPU in that if u want after 1 or 2 years? No u cannot...not even the HDD & Macs are future proof , you cannot even install a Core 2 Quad in Mac, u cannot upgrade your graphics card in Mac.ambandla said:FYI, the size of latest mac desktop is the size of an LCD monitor that you see in PC world. How many such products have you seen? BTW, mac desktops/lappys are futureproof. They are already high end machines that have so much power in them. if you say mac mini, it's a budget PC from apple that costs just 35k and you can carry it anywhere you want to go.
Some say that getting a motherboard that supports an insanely priced quad core processor is future proof and "even the hardware change is not necessary" does not mean anything.
Apple is years ahead of microsoft because
1) They follow the rule "Innovative (forgot the original word here) software companies should design their own hardware"
2) APPLE ecosystem is based on simplicity, stability and beauty.
3) macboys don't get driver issues
4) macboys don't wait service packs. (MS users: SP1 is released, lets wait for SP2 as there are new bugs and compat. issues)
5) macboys does not depend on hundreds of companies to release their product updates for compatibility with newly released OS.
6) most importantly, macboys don't get the "BLUEDEATH" screen.
I am runing Windows Vista ultimate fine with a WEI rating of 3.5 on my 3 years old PC, now this is what I call future proof, oh & this was handpicked too....by meFutureproof in the sense any app released are tend to seamlessly work with existing hardware (not the microsoft way of seamlessly working with existing hardware)
VistaHint: kernel mode and user mode operations
gx_saurav said:I am saying this publically, you have no knowledge of computing & technology
Ya right, most of the users here have already said, we can get the same performance in PC in just 40k, saving or profiting 10k
I wonder, if PC gaming sux according to Arya etc...then why is it that almighty Apple is doing everything, & even praising everyone to buy a Mac hardware & install Windows on it to play Games . Again it's proved that Mac & Apple needs PC & microsoft to survive. The switch to Intel CPU was because of this only so that they can get the software ports of Windows/Linux apps easily
its not about just running the s/w, its about running them smoothly.ambandla said:buying better hardware for every better software doesn't mean that it's future proof.
Getting new software run on existing hardware without a problem is future proof.
& maybe coz they are "Insanely Priced" & very less "Choice"macboys are not changing hardware as much as PC boys do. Why? because of the power.
dude what i said was if you want more fire power, then a C2Q is the Answer.Some say that getting a motherboard that supports an insanely priced quad core processor is future proof and "even the hardware change is not necessary" does not mean anything.
s18000rpm said:its not about just running the s/w, its about running them smoothly.
todays s/w & games work seamlessly on current config., but as time passes & "Technology Improves", newer s/w & games will "Need More Power" (RAM, procy....) to work better
& maybe coz they are "Insanely Priced" & very less "Choice"
dude what i said was if you want more fire power, then a C2Q is the Answer.
& about the "Insanely Price" of C2Q, in "Future" the prices will drop to more "affordable bracket" as 8 core processors are under development
i can start with a P4 (which i already hav) & in few months get C2D & in some year(s) a C2Q & i dont need to buy a whole new system to get more power
same s/w, same h/w config except Processor
i think you got my point
Don't bring consoles here, please. A console is dedicated for games and can survive because games are custom built for them. PS3 is hot off the stove, right? See how Bioshock and Crysis beat the living crap outta it.For example, take PS3.
Are you trying to point at PC users specifically or the people newly introduced to computers?The majority of consumers buy a PC and wish to use that for few years without any need to upgrade. Am I wrong here?
I guess the isolation factor being discussed is between Mac and non-mac users. Not between Windows and Mac users. Your point works for PC owners as well, those on Linux, you know.Yes. profiting 10k and losing hours of time trying to keep it secure. What about the amount spent on antivirus,firewalls and other security products?
gx_saurav said:the forum is ruled by macboys now, arya was not banned for what he did, for his personal comments, but i was banned
kirangp said:hmm...well in my eagerness I wrote dashboard also..yup it was a rip off of Konfabulator after all