Cricket Controversies

Discussion in 'Random News' started by nikku12982, Aug 23, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. nikku12982

    nikku12982 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    England vs Pakistan

    WHOSE FAULT WAS IT?
    Inzy or Daryl Hair
     
  2. aqeel_phool

    aqeel_phool New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 20, 2006
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Pakistan
    absolutely daryl was faulty. he always do things against asians. i don't like him.
     
  3. nik_for_you

    nik_for_you New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2004
    Messages:
    313
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Paris
    i dont know the whole story.. what happened?
     
  4. the deconstructionist

    the deconstructionist New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2006
    Messages:
    161
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    chasing new ideas
    Both were wrong, Hair for not having enough proof and Pakis to have walked out.
     
  5. eagle_y2j

    eagle_y2j New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 7, 2004
    Messages:
    724
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Himalayas
    Pakistan should obey rules of cricket
     
  6. danantha

    danantha Member

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2006
    Messages:
    31
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    6
    it should be daryl because he doent have any evidence against pak except the tampered ball. he should not do this he is always against asians. he is a freek
     
  7. iMav

    iMav The Devil's Advocate

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,004
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Masti Ki Paathshaala
    the hair comes up with a proof that 1 of the pakis tampered with the ball ..... then hair is right .... if cant then looking at his past record with pakistan and lanka and india .... icc should have no hair
     
  8. paul_007

    paul_007 New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2005
    Messages:
    801
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    earth

    absolutely agree with u
     
  9. OP
    OP
    nikku12982

    nikku12982 New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 6, 2006
    Messages:
    33
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    first david shepherd had a problem with pakistan

    and now that arrogant daryl hair? i hope he should get retired and

    consult with a doctor ,he is too old to be an umpire

    he think only australians can win the match by hard work
    others always cheat .i think he also had a problem with muralitharan that he hasnt right action.

    first sri lanka then pakistan now who knows india would be next
     
  10. iMav

    iMav The Devil's Advocate

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,004
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Masti Ki Paathshaala
    .... if i am not wrong he had problems with bhajji's action
     
  11. hanwant

    hanwant New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    In people's Heart
    I think Inzamam was at fault here, he should have informaed Daryl Hair that pakistan will be going for a protest during the tea session and they will be registering a protest againt the ball temparing issue. This could have solved the whole issue, as its allowed by the law of ICC that a team can register its protest by delaying the match, by not coming onto the field for a certain period of time.
    As umpires are ICC officials..they have rights to forfeit the match if they think so.
     
  12. iMav

    iMav The Devil's Advocate

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,004
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Masti Ki Paathshaala
    what should he inform if they dont come out hair will know that they are protesting ..... however if u mean inzy should hav given hair a dhamki that they will not play ..... then what good wud it do the situation wud hav remained the same in either case.....
     
  13. hanwant

    hanwant New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2006
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    In people's Heart
    Go and read ICC laws:

    Extracts from ICC law:

    Level 2
    The Offences set out at 2.1 to 2.11 below are Level 2 Offences. The Penalty for a Level 2 Offence shall be a fine of the equivalent of between 50% of the Player or Official’s match fee up to their full match fee and/or a 1 Test Match or 2 ODI Match ban

    2.9 Changing the condition of the ball in breach of Law 42.3 as read with Standard Test Match and ODI Playing Conditions clause 42.1 (this supplements and does not replace the provisions of the Laws of Cricket and Standard Test Match and ODI Playing Conditions).

    12. In the event of a Player or Team Official being alleged to have breached the Rules of Conduct during a Tour in circumstances where, pursuant to Section D 11, the matter falls to be determined by the ICC Chief Referee or the relevant Player or Team Official’s Home Board, the ICC Chief Referee or that Home Board, as the case may be, shall be entitled, in their absolute discretion, to request the Referee to determine the matter in accordance with the procedures set forth in this Code of Conduct.
     
  14. iMav

    iMav The Devil's Advocate

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2006
    Messages:
    7,004
    Likes Received:
    11
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Masti Ki Paathshaala
    ^^ what i am saying is that even if inzy told the match ref that we are not gonna play coz hair has been biased and is accusing of something we have not done ..... there was no chance that hair would have reversed his desicion and wud not have re-tracked on his judgement that the pakis had tampered with the ball .... the deadlock wud have happened in any case ....
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page