they will even look for out for dating their enemy's women's tooo
They may look out, but they are unlikely to find dates among the enemy's women. Unless of course, she is a spy or a double crosser.
China is the most untrustworthy and selfish country of all times. they are funding genocide in tibet and africa.
China, like any other powerful country, looks for its own interest. China doesn't fund any genocides in Africa nor did it attempt to meddle in the politics of countries it does business with. As for what China is doing to Tibet, is it any different or any more than what we are doing to North East or Kashmir? The only difference is, the North Easterns don't have the political significance to command billions of CIA propaganda dollars.
.... corruption is rife in that country.
Which again, is less than in India. At least a Russian can expect a passport or an export license without paying bribes to at least three officials, like they do in India. Murderers and rapists can be expected to be prosecuted without a trial lasting a minimum of 20 years.
india as you know, is weak from the inside. thats why we cannot even dare to challenge pakistan. forget pak, we cannot even question a country like bangadesh, which had returned our dead soldiers in a very disrespectful way. terrorists are again pouring in from the bangla border. islamist extremism is rampant tthere.
India is militarily the second most powerful country in Asia, we can easily overrun Pakistan in a matter of days. The problem is not that Indians are weak, the problem is that our political leaders lack the political will to have an aggressive foreign policy against countries like Pakistan, Sri Lanka or Bangladesh. We overran Pakistan in 1971, when Pakistan's military was backed by the United States. We made one of the largest mass surrenders in history by taking 90000 Pakistani soldiers captive in a single battle.
france: better placed that the above mentioned countries. they have the guts to condemn china's inhumane acts. i applaud nicholas sarkozys decision to critisize china over the tibet issue.
Sarkozy knows as well as any sane person does, criticism will do nothing to change the Chinese government stance on Tibet.
right now, if china invades us, US will help us.
Not really. US cares only about its own interests and if there is a China vs India war, US back out. Attacking China is less in its interests than China attacking India is. In fact, in the 1971 War against Pakistan, the US sent USS Enterprise armed with nuclear missiles to strike Indian cities if India goes ahead with its plan to liberate Bangladesh. It is only because of a Russian nuclear submarine from Vladivostok that tailed the Enterprise on Indira Gandhi's call for help, that millions of Indians didn't become victims of a nuclear holocaust.
At present United States is the biggest arms supplier to one of the most anti-Indian countries on the planet - Pakistan. It is also the biggest trade partner with the biggest military threat to India - China. Its all about politics and business, if you trust US to help against China, you might as well move all Indians to the Maldives.
...the way it did help kuwait. russia will not help us.
US didn't help Kuwait. US protected its strategic economic and military in Kuwait from Iraqi attacks. If Iraq took over Kuwait and US didn't do anything about it, they'd have lost military bases, the goodwill of Arab oil leagues like Saudi Arabia and also risked their strategic influence in the Middle East. If the Middle Eastern region were rich with avocados instead of petroleum, Kuwait would have been an Iraqi province and Saddam would have been the US recognised President of Iraq.
i tellyou, the US is the best country.
US may be the best country for Pakistani and Saudi Arabian interests, but definitely not for us Indians.
