Kniwor
Learner
LOL... don't attack me yaar If u're getting irritated and cant prove ur point.
I thought we were having a technical discussion, ha...ha... please be calm. "dingemini312" asked me about my card and was too concerned about warranty, I suggested him to buy this one.... (go ask him)... I dont care about the stupid sale, but Please get the facts right.
About the competing performance at high resolutions, it only makes the matters worse, the better performance is shown above 1920 x 1200 useless for practical purposes because frame rates are too low of all cards. 7900GT looks better till 1600x1200. So if the 1920x1200 and above benchmarks are excluded, which are impractical, the gap will only widen between the cards.
xbitlabs, tomshardware tell the same story, how many times must I repeat myself, u just refuse to see any benchmarks and keep singing the song, crying about IQ (Which they've already said difference is not noticeable to human eye). Enabling High Quality AF is 1 good feature. but look at the big performance gap dude. We are talking about performance, and there is no sign that 1950pro is near, not even to the stock 7900GT, how do u conclude it's equal to extreme edition? (this was the comment u made, remember?)
I have all the patience, but please enlighten us how is the performance of 1950Pro equal to 7900GT extreme edition, when it does not even match the stock 7900GT. please I said, u wont disappoint us right. because I cant see where u made ur point. (except giving an AMD review for AMD card, even AMD is not claiming that it's better than stock one, only mohit is claiming..lol..)
I thought we were having a technical discussion, ha...ha... please be calm. "dingemini312" asked me about my card and was too concerned about warranty, I suggested him to buy this one.... (go ask him)... I dont care about the stupid sale, but Please get the facts right.
About the competing performance at high resolutions, it only makes the matters worse, the better performance is shown above 1920 x 1200 useless for practical purposes because frame rates are too low of all cards. 7900GT looks better till 1600x1200. So if the 1920x1200 and above benchmarks are excluded, which are impractical, the gap will only widen between the cards.
xbitlabs, tomshardware tell the same story, how many times must I repeat myself, u just refuse to see any benchmarks and keep singing the song, crying about IQ (Which they've already said difference is not noticeable to human eye). Enabling High Quality AF is 1 good feature. but look at the big performance gap dude. We are talking about performance, and there is no sign that 1950pro is near, not even to the stock 7900GT, how do u conclude it's equal to extreme edition? (this was the comment u made, remember?)
I have all the patience, but please enlighten us how is the performance of 1950Pro equal to 7900GT extreme edition, when it does not even match the stock 7900GT. please I said, u wont disappoint us right. because I cant see where u made ur point. (except giving an AMD review for AMD card, even AMD is not claiming that it's better than stock one, only mohit is claiming..lol..)