AMD to nVidia : prove it, don’t just say it!
- Status
who gets a good card from the competition.....
Dangerous Dave
Digital Marketer
What th cost of both the cards in India?
pauldmps
Banned
^^ Might be. I am not an expert in GPUs, I just wrote what I read somewhere.
Digit reports that the AMD one is about only 1% faster but the Nvidia is much less noisier, cooler & consumes less power.
Nvidia releases the GeForce GTX 590 - Online Best Latest Price Reviews | Features in India
Digit reports that the AMD one is about only 1% faster but the Nvidia is much less noisier, cooler & consumes less power.
Nvidia releases the GeForce GTX 590 - Online Best Latest Price Reviews | Features in India
Jaskanwar Singh
Aspiring Novelist
^^no. continue in that gtx 590 thread in graphic card section. *www.thinkdigit.com/forum/graphic-cards/137839-gtx-590-discussion-2.html
vicky lol they are testing without any sort of aa and with premature amd drivers(they still mention flickering)
now shall i mention something here about new dragon age2? nvidia is still to improve performance in that.
check the same review you posted. the next page. they mention nvidia has same issue of drivers with dragon age2 as amd with crysis2. that is immature drivers.
vicky lol they are testing without any sort of aa and with premature amd drivers(they still mention flickering)
now shall i mention something here about new dragon age2? nvidia is still to improve performance in that.
check the same review you posted. the next page. they mention nvidia has same issue of drivers with dragon age2 as amd with crysis2. that is immature drivers.
Last edited:
skeletor
Chosen of the Omnissiah
*i.imgur.com/bbezn.jpg
*i.imgur.com/Cvggd.jpg
where the eff is 1920x1080?? Been over a year now.
I can't even force it.yup, I know how irritating that 99% load bug with ATi cards is. But this thing is equally irritating for me. I think 10.10e with Avivo disabled fixes that 99% load bug.
I'd consider a game like Battlefield: BF2 a better way to compare instead of a TWIMTBP game.
vickybat
I am the night...I am...
^^ I would wait for battlefield 3 in that case. In fact its also good in bulletstorm and thats based on unreal engine.
Even the original crysis was a TWIMTBP title and was unbiased. So is crysis 2. Lets wait some more proper reviews with fixed drivers to pass the verdict. But i have a feeling that its going to favour fermi's tlp architecture here. Newer games should but its still early to comment.
In fact 590 performs better in battlefield 2 in the waterfall bench at high resolution. It falls just short in the chase bench.
But waterfall bench has much more to render than the chase bench and is more taxing. Saying this from personal experience.
Even the original crysis was a TWIMTBP title and was unbiased. So is crysis 2. Lets wait some more proper reviews with fixed drivers to pass the verdict. But i have a feeling that its going to favour fermi's tlp architecture here. Newer games should but its still early to comment.
In fact 590 performs better in battlefield 2 in the waterfall bench at high resolution. It falls just short in the chase bench.
But waterfall bench has much more to render than the chase bench and is more taxing. Saying this from personal experience.
Last edited:
skeletor
Chosen of the Omnissiah
Most of the arguments which I've seen from people in these fanboy threads is pure FUD without backing things with facts. Just use some articulate language with heavy terms which people themselves don't know about, and people think they really know stuff. Worthless fights. And then use of semi-cooked games for comparing benchmarks. Lastly random bolded text which almost translates to shouting.
And personally speaking, I'm tired of cleaning up posts.
Here's the best conclusion: Equilibrium: AMD Radeon HD 6990 vs. Nvidia GeForce GTX 590. Page 11 - X-bit labs
Lastly it was good to see nVidia coming back with GTX 500 series. There had been too much AMD/ATi pwnage with HD 4000 and HD 5000 in the last 3 years. Expecting the same from Bulldozer.
And personally speaking, I'm tired of cleaning up posts.
Here's the best conclusion: Equilibrium: AMD Radeon HD 6990 vs. Nvidia GeForce GTX 590. Page 11 - X-bit labs
Lastly it was good to see nVidia coming back with GTX 500 series. There had been too much AMD/ATi pwnage with HD 4000 and HD 5000 in the last 3 years. Expecting the same from Bulldozer.
vickybat
I am the night...I am...
^^ Actually if you are pointing me, then you'd see that i had backed down from that thread. Clearly it was leading nowhere and was foolish of me nagging the same things again and again.
What articulate language did i exactly use which i don't know myself? Can you please point it out?
Can you point out the games you consider semi-cooked?
About that conclusion of yours, i had already posted the xbit link in the gtx 590 thread in my second last post there. But it fell on blind eyes and nobody paid heed to any of it. Check my post HERE.
So its better to back of. My posts were neither fanboyish nor they appeared to be shouting at anybody. My fonts and sizes were normal but can't say about other posters. I was absolutely neutral.
What articulate language did i exactly use which i don't know myself? Can you please point it out?
Can you point out the games you consider semi-cooked?
About that conclusion of yours, i had already posted the xbit link in the gtx 590 thread in my second last post there. But it fell on blind eyes and nobody paid heed to any of it. Check my post HERE.
So its better to back of. My posts were neither fanboyish nor they appeared to be shouting at anybody. My fonts and sizes were normal but can't say about other posters. I was absolutely neutral.
Last edited:
skeletor
Chosen of the Omnissiah
I'm not pointing at anyone. 
Rather everyone.
Two people got warned in that thread. You weren't one of them.
'GTX 590 responding better to higher clocks' was fanboyish. To overclock further more than a limit, you have to slightly overvolt. And when you overvolt GTX 590, it is going poof for many people. Cheap VRM? The reference cooler is crap.
Rather everyone.Two people got warned in that thread. You weren't one of them.
'GTX 590 responding better to higher clocks' was fanboyish. To overclock further more than a limit, you have to slightly overvolt. And when you overvolt GTX 590, it is going poof for many people. Cheap VRM? The reference cooler is crap.
Piyush
Lanaya
ok guys i've been reading this thread and the other one too since days
and to be honest its leading nowhere
Do you really know whats happening here?
guy 1:hey check it out..these are the benchmarks from xyz site.....man,fd xxxx is beating shiit out of ftx xxx
guy 2:^^well not really....you see the difference is too small in that benchmark ....here look at this link: abc.com
this is some serious stuff
guy 3:yes i agree with that^^.ftx xyz is winning all the way....its because mainly because of its banana technology
they have implied it very nicely....fd xxxx has no chance against banana technology
guy 4:Oh really...because i'm not buying that
see FD xxxx already has a far superior technology -that is mango technology
look at those benchmarks from kela.com
they have clearly mentioned that mango technology has edge over banana technology
guy 3:who wants mango technology when their graphic cards have serious driver issues
guy 1:but those issues can be fixed with latest updates and patches from here : mangojuice.com
meanwhile look at these benchmarks....one more proof of fd xxxx winning easily
guy 2:^^thats because of the game is developed to perform on these cards
guess what ...see the benchmarks of this game and reply then
guy 1:i dont trust that site.they dont do good benchmarking....check this site for the same game that you mentioned and see the difference..source : bheja fry.com
guy 2:thats noobish
even i can say that i dont trust the site which you gave
see when you saw the results in which ftx xxx beating fd xxxx you changed the subject ...so do me a favour dont put any links of crappy sites
guy 1:who are you to tell me what to post and what not to....you are just spoiling the decorum of the forum
guy 2why i'm even talking to you noob
guy 1:whatever jerk
and to be honest its leading nowhere
Do you really know whats happening here?
guy 1:hey check it out..these are the benchmarks from xyz site.....man,fd xxxx is beating shiit out of ftx xxx
guy 2:^^well not really....you see the difference is too small in that benchmark ....here look at this link: abc.com
this is some serious stuff
guy 3:yes i agree with that^^.ftx xyz is winning all the way....its because mainly because of its banana technology
they have implied it very nicely....fd xxxx has no chance against banana technology
guy 4:Oh really...because i'm not buying that
see FD xxxx already has a far superior technology -that is mango technology
look at those benchmarks from kela.com
they have clearly mentioned that mango technology has edge over banana technology
guy 3:who wants mango technology when their graphic cards have serious driver issues
guy 1:but those issues can be fixed with latest updates and patches from here : mangojuice.com
meanwhile look at these benchmarks....one more proof of fd xxxx winning easily
guy 2:^^thats because of the game is developed to perform on these cards
guess what ...see the benchmarks of this game and reply then
guy 1:i dont trust that site.they dont do good benchmarking....check this site for the same game that you mentioned and see the difference..source : bheja fry.com
guy 2:thats noobish
even i can say that i dont trust the site which you gave
see when you saw the results in which ftx xxx beating fd xxxx you changed the subject ...so do me a favour dont put any links of crappy sites
guy 1:who are you to tell me what to post and what not to....you are just spoiling the decorum of the forum
guy 2why i'm even talking to you noob
guy 1:whatever jerk
vickybat
I am the night...I am...
@ ico
Okay. But i was speaking more of a general fact than the 590. See fermi architecture responds relatively more to clock speeds afaik. Thats because parralelism in the thread level increases when clock speed is increased which directly effects the throughput. Simply put , more no. of threads gets processed faster when speeds increase{ in layman's terms.)
But in ilp, similar instruction sets are waited for a thread to be processed ( due to the dependancies )and bumping speeds though gets a performance increase not in the level of a tlp architecture. So its kind of a general rule. I meant this. But there are lot of other aspects involved too. Ilp is not completely booged down and tlp does not have an outright advantage.
About overvolting, yeah its an issue with the current forceware drivers and indeed 590's go poof when overvolting beyond 1.000v. Expect this to get fixed though.
What say buddy?
Okay. But i was speaking more of a general fact than the 590. See fermi architecture responds relatively more to clock speeds afaik. Thats because parralelism in the thread level increases when clock speed is increased which directly effects the throughput. Simply put , more no. of threads gets processed faster when speeds increase{ in layman's terms.)
But in ilp, similar instruction sets are waited for a thread to be processed ( due to the dependancies )and bumping speeds though gets a performance increase not in the level of a tlp architecture. So its kind of a general rule. I meant this. But there are lot of other aspects involved too. Ilp is not completely booged down and tlp does not have an outright advantage.
About overvolting, yeah its an issue with the current forceware drivers and indeed 590's go poof when overvolting beyond 1.000v. Expect this to get fixed though.
What say buddy?
- Status