Who is Next gen hero
- Status
iMav
The Devil's Advocate
wat im saying is said by ratan tata not by the politicos ... ratan tata doesnt need a poster boy .... thr is no point discussing ratan tata's credibility or his principles coz honestly ur the only kid who has done so .... get ur facts right for starters start watching some interviews and reviews .... as i said before not being infamous doesnt equal to b secretive .... its ur lack of knowledge not them hiding facts
Aberforth
The Internationalist
mAV3 said:
mAV3 said:
Oh really, man. Keep some consistency when you talk, you're shooting yourself in the foot.
mAV3 said:
mAV3 said:
You contradict yourself again and proved its not worth my time arguing with you.
I have the facts first hand because I guess you don't know I have personally know people in WB and some of them right close to Singur. As you yourself said...half knowledge is dangerous things. Now don't go telling me Amitabh Bachan deserves the presidency of India cause thats what they've been hyping these days.
iMav
The Devil's Advocate
u hav seen interviews of only 1 side ... see interviews of both sides ... did u see tata's interview on ndtv or cnn-ibn or any of the shows relating to this incident (i guess not) did u read either the economic times or TOI (i am certain .... not)
ratan tata has clearly stated tht it was buddhadebh who asked him to invest in bengal ... ur first quote made sense but the second didnt ... let me clarify for starters watch interviews but dont base ur opinion completely on them searcha bit read a little more and then u shall understand .... both the statements were in a different context clubbing them together gives wat u pointed out
y hav stopped talking abt tata's credibility ???? this whole discussion is a result of u questioning ratan tata's priciples (tata group's principles) and his credibility, and again get ur facts rite .... the singur row is coz of 2 politicians .... to ratan tata it makes no difference whether his plant is at singur or somewhr else .... the car is gonna b the same
whr did amitabh come here and as far as singur ppl are concerned .... again its not tata at fault its the bengal govt .... if u ask the farmers of punjab they will say tht it is unffair tht their land is taken if u ask the hutmen of mumbai they will say tht taking their land for an airport is unfair if u ask the ppl of gujratthey will say taking their home for a dam is unfair .... it happens everywhr ....
its not tata's fault tht the ppl of singur are getting homeless or loosing their land ... its the govt who wants development and the opposition who wants to oppose
ratan tata has clearly stated tht it was buddhadebh who asked him to invest in bengal ... ur first quote made sense but the second didnt ... let me clarify for starters watch interviews but dont base ur opinion completely on them searcha bit read a little more and then u shall understand .... both the statements were in a different context clubbing them together gives wat u pointed out
y hav stopped talking abt tata's credibility ???? this whole discussion is a result of u questioning ratan tata's priciples (tata group's principles) and his credibility, and again get ur facts rite .... the singur row is coz of 2 politicians .... to ratan tata it makes no difference whether his plant is at singur or somewhr else .... the car is gonna b the same
whr did amitabh come here and as far as singur ppl are concerned .... again its not tata at fault its the bengal govt .... if u ask the farmers of punjab they will say tht it is unffair tht their land is taken if u ask the hutmen of mumbai they will say tht taking their land for an airport is unfair if u ask the ppl of gujratthey will say taking their home for a dam is unfair .... it happens everywhr ....
its not tata's fault tht the ppl of singur are getting homeless or loosing their land ... its the govt who wants development and the opposition who wants to oppose
Last edited:
Aberforth
The Internationalist
mAV3 said:
You are certain of something which is so mistaken and fantastic, anyone can imagine your position in a debate and 'facts'. Just because I didn't give my interviews on being a subscriber of TOI and Economic Times doesn't mean I am not a reader. In fact, thats the first thing I do after my morning walk and meditation when there is no power.
mAV3 said:
Just because a selfish politician decided to take mileage using people's sympathy doesn't mean the people have got no credibility. Tata first blamed competitors and then later, politicians. Perhaps some people (including Ratan Tata) really need to know villagers can have their opinions without being pushed around - but then who really cared about them except for their votes?
mAV3 said:
No it doesn't but its going to matter to the villagers who are displaced...and not given adequate compensation in return. It is easy to get distracted by the glitter.
mAV3 said:
Really? A quote by Tata himself, something about guns and his head says something different....maybe he is not all that willing to move...eh? Check that out.
You know, Ratan Tata is admananant because of his ego (unlike the nobler JRD Tata); media loves controversies for its fodder; politicians want political mileage from the controversy.....the real people who lose are the villagers of Singur. The point is moot and lets move on, I choose not to reply to any further post you make in this thread. Carry it to PM or make a thread if you really want to discuss...
Last edited:
piyush gupta
Cyborg Agent
hey for me its Bill Gates
see usne Mac ka interface and Linux ka shell use karke VISTA banaya
now he is one of he richest person on this earth
he is an inspiration see from where he started his life and now he is at what position
see usne Mac ka interface and Linux ka shell use karke VISTA banaya
now he is one of he richest person on this earth
he is an inspiration see from where he started his life and now he is at what position
iMav
The Devil's Advocate
i know the interview ur talking abt and tata has never retracted saying th a competitor doesnt hav his hands in this row ... and tata has said tht put a gun to my head either shoot or move the gun he is not gonna budge and he his rright if the govt of bengal is backing the project and if acc. to tata a competitor is fueling the row y shud tata not start his plant .... bengal govt approached him to start aplant thr he accepted the offer politicians started taking mileage (as a result some ppl started doubting tata's principles)
how does the bengal incident taint tata's credibility ....
how does the bengal incident taint tata's credibility ....
Aberforth
The Internationalist
piyush619 said:
Much that I dislike Microsoft and Gates for their greed and expensive Vista, this is one thing I have to agree. Gates is one person responsible for the home PC revolution and making hardware a choice rather than package (compared to erstwhile IBM or Apple).
blademast3r
In the zone
BINGO!!!! he is one man we shud all look up to...pathiks said:
hailgautam
Youngling
what is wrong with DHONI man ???
Darthvader
Back From Deathstar
mail2and said:
U hit the nail on the head absolutely . It looks as if Netaji had fought to free Bengal as this is where atleast people remember His name
Arsenal_Gunners
Human Spambot
Nothing except you will just forget him after some time,maybe after WC.hailgautam said:
Ankur Mittal
Journeyman
It's me and no one else!!!!!!!!
OP
ssdivisiongermany1933
Still in war with allies
if u r talking about ur personal views , then it's me all the time
- Status