And why is that ? when posting negative statement ,kindly tell the reason also
I have been using Eureka Forbes Vaccum Cleaner buyed (10+ years ) its still working perfectly ( but it bit heavy model ) *old is gold , I am using it still now
Well to be quite honest I thought about mentioning the reason, but then thought even mentioning that is a waste of time. You see I bought the machine called Eureka Forbes Bravo, but that machine is so worst that I can't say where shall I start! If someone wants a portable gas burner then he/she is welcome to try it, but if for cleaning, then well, a fart is more powerful than the power of its.
Old vacuum cleaner? Well that's indeed piece of gold. I have one (broken), which is almost fifteen years old, I don't know what brand that is, and it still can suck dust at least twice more powerful than that damn Eureka one, hell additionally, it even has a turbo charge enabling switch, and even after half an hour of usage it didn't become nowhere near as hot as the Bravo.
As I said, Eureka Forbes is ****, at least for vacuum cleaners they are. So investing behind them is meaningless, at least they are dead in my dictionary.
, it was there when my mother was child
vidhubhushan
Alakh Niranjan
^ i have seen this model working perfectly all right for quite long including dusting from carpets.
mikael_schiffer
Padawan
HAHAHAH we have the same Vacuum C Leaner. We had it back in the early 1990s. I remember a smart Salesman coming at our home and selling it to my Mom, with all sweet words and ****. We used it two to three times MAX . . . . .it was heavy, cumbersome, damn noisy, power cord wasnt long enough etc etc
XD XD
XD XD