the FOOTBALL channel

Which is the team you HATE the most

  • Chelsea

  • Manchester United

  • Barcelona

  • Arsenal

  • Real Madrid

  • A.C. Milan

  • Liverpool

  • Manchester City

Results are only viewable after voting.
Liverpool_fan

Liverpool_fan

Sami Hyypiä, LFC legend
Chelsea? Lol?

Come on QPR, make my day.

Lovely work Swansea.

Fernando Torres - More goals for Liverpool this calendar year than Chelsea. :lol::lol::lol:

Can't have everything but brilliant couple of days.
 
XTerminator

XTerminator

Welbeck fan :D
*www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/N...Written Reasons of Regulatory Commission.ashx

How stupid does Liverpool and Suarez look now? and those t-shirts :lol:
 
Liverpool_fan

Liverpool_fan

Sami Hyypiä, LFC legend
It would be immensely embarrassing if that is indeed the truth. Waiting for the club's statement.
In fact he should be suspended from the club if that's the truth...
 
XTerminator

XTerminator

Welbeck fan :D
LFC should've taken a neutral stance in this case. If the charges are'nt countered with some *strong* evidence, it puts the club into some shame.
 
OP
Arsenal_Gunners

Arsenal_Gunners

Human Spambot
"Mr Evra" trending on twitter :lol:

While I never agreed with Liverpool's initial stance and defence of Suarez and found some of it pathetic,I don't believe for a minute that Dalglish and co. were aware of the level of cvntery going on,like some Mancs are conspiring.
 
Liverpool_fan

Liverpool_fan

Sami Hyypiä, LFC legend
FA's version:
The FA's case, in short, was as follows. In the goalmouth, Mr Evra and Mr Suarez spoke to
each other in Spanish. Mr Evra asked Mr Suarez why he had kicked him, referring to the
foul five minutes previously. Mr Suarez replied "Porque tu eres negro", meaning "Because
you are black". Mr Evra then said to Mr Suarez “say it to me again, I’m going to punch
you”. Mr Suarez replied "No hablo con los negros", meaning "I don't speak to blacks". Mr
Evra continued by saying that he now thought he was going to punch Mr Suarez. Mr
Suarez replied "Dale, negro, negro, negro", which meant "okay, blackie, blackie, blackie".
As Mr Suarez said this, he reached out to touch Mr Evra's arm, gesturing at his skin. Mr
Kuyt then intervened. When the referee blew his whistle and called the players over to
him shortly after the exchanges in the goalmouth, Mr Evra said to the referee "ref, ref, he
just called me a ****ing black".
Click to expand...

Club's version:
Mr Suarez denied the Charge. His case, in short, was as follows. He agreed with Mr Evra
that they spoke to each other in Spanish in the goalmouth. When Mr Evra asked why he
had kicked him, Mr Suarez replied that it was a normal foul and shrugged his shoulders.
Mr Evra then said that he was going to kick Mr Suarez, to which Mr Suarez told him to
shut up. As Mr Kuyt was approaching, Mr Suarez touched Mr Evra's left arm in a
pinching style movement. According to Mr Suarez, at no point in the goalmouth did he
use the word "negro". When the referee blew his whistle to stop play, Mr Evra spoke to Mr
Suarez and said (in English) "Don't touch me, South American". Mr Suarez replied "Por
que, negro?". He says that he used the word “negro” in a way with which he was familiar
from his upbringing in Uruguay. In this sense, Mr Suarez claimed, it is used as a noun and
as a friendly form of address to people seen as black or brown-skinned (or even just black-
haired). Thus, it meant "Why, black?" Mr Suarez maintained that when he said "Por que,
negro?" to Mr Evra, it was intended in a conciliatory and friendly way. Mr Suarez said this
was the only time that he used the word “negro” in his exchanges with Mr Evra during
the match.
Click to expand...

I don't know I find the first hard to believe. Even harder to believe the club supported him if the 1st is the case. That is blatant and moronic racism as it is drawn in the claim.
Right.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom