national anthem a hoax!!!

[kumarmohit]

Kewl, assuming now that you are a rather knowledgeable person, I would really want to know why you do not grace me with the answers of the questions about RSS. OK let us just abandon the third question answer the first two.

More than that can you present one single irrefutable proof which says that this claim is made by RSS. Any scan of the printed paper where they claim this, any link on the RSS website with such a page. Considering that you have been with the RSS for so long, I think it would be a child's play for you to bring a single irrefutable proof.

What I want to know is if, when and how did RSS claim such a thing?

 

[ahref]

1) Rashtriya Savika Samiti

2) Full uniform
a) Black cap
b) White Shirt
c) Belt
d) Khaki Knicker
e) Khaki Socks
f) Black shoe
g) Dand (Bamboo Stick)

Now don't tell I googled it. If you want I still remember by heart their Song.


Namstey Sada Vatasley Matr Bhoomey
Tavya Hindu Bhoomey Sukham .....

My first post in RSS was Mukhya Shikshak. (If you have some connection with RSS, you must be aware of this post and their importance)

That thing (National anthem )is surely RSS, I do not have time to collect proof. I am 101% sure. If any one don't want to believe I have no interest to make them believe.

 

[kumarmohit]

While I agree that you have the appropriate knowledge and accept that you do did not goofle it (I take your word for it), I also see one more thing, the effect of what we in journalism call, The Hypodermic Syringe Theory.


It says that the audience is passive and accepts what the media says so if we tell a lie 100 times they would believe it is true.


You are saying it because you think that you are 101% sure that it is RSS but man, the fact is that you can not just go out blaming someone unless you have any irrefutable proof. If people start to believe and prosecute just becoz someone is 101% sure, we would be prosecuting almost every second person.

Please do not be blame anyone unless you have solid, irrefutable proof.

The fact of the matter is that while Indian media in general and English media in particular try to print an image of RSS as devil incarnate, the truth is that not even a single time has any court of law held RSS at fault. Twice or thrice it was banned but every time courts lifted the ban.

I am not saying that every one in RSS is pure but the fact of the matter is that just because some people are bad, we can not say that entire organization is bad.

While I am going off topic here, I am going to take that risk here. The efact of the matter is that Indian media and RSS have always been at odds because RSS is the only organization which has enough numbers that it can lauch such a public communication camapign that the entire depedence of people on media would be nullified. The media is against RSS becuase of the fact that RSS has enogh numbers that it can put entire India media out of business just by launching a word of mouth communication campaign.

 

[ahref]

@kumarmohit

the fact is that you can not just go out blaming someone unless you have any irrefutable proof. If people start to believe and prosecute just becoz someone is 101% sure, we would be prosecuting almost every second person.

I am not blaming, I am giving my opinion and no one is going to prosecute anyone on my statement.

The fact of the matter is that while Indian media in general and English media in particular try to print an image of RSS as devil incarnate

I do not see RSS from english media angle, I see it from my 14 active years of participation in RSS activites.

RSS has very strong hidden agenda, which everyone knows and their views about Mahatma Gandhi, Nehru, Indian tricolour is not unknown to anyone.

Regarding numbers, how many active shakha of RSS runs at your area and how many people per day come in Shakha of RSS?

 

[Arsenal_Gunners]

1) Rashtriya Savika Samiti

Isnt it Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh?

 

[ahref]

ROOOFL You posted in wrong thread

Yes, it was in wrong thread, I deleted it.

 

[mayanks_098]

Isnt it Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh?

yep guys,which RSS you talking about.
and regarding the topic,well,what (i think) kumarmohit said is true,that it might be that it was composed for a british king but now we sing it for our motherland only

 

[ahref]

Isnt it Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh?

It is women wing of RSS, read the question kumarmohit asked. What is women wing of RSS?

 

[enticer86]

Yeah, i know abt this fact... but then- nobody cares here.

 

[Arsenal_Gunners]

It is women wing of RSS, read the question kumarmohit asked. What is women wing of RSS?

Sorry I missed that.

 

[mrbgupta]

Tagore wrote a song long before 1971 (He died in 1941) :

'' Amar sonar bangla ami tomay bhalobasi
Tomar akash tomar batas amar prane bajay banshee".
If translated in english word by word it means :
'' My golden bengal I love you,
your sky, your air plays flute in my heart"

Tagore wrote this song when partition of bengal was not happened.
In 1971 when Bangladesh was born from pakistan this song had been selected as national anthem.
Do bangladeshis ever question that the song was not written for bangladesh rather for whole bengal?
We ,indians , only love to finger in every matter.

Hail our democracy !!!!!!!!!

 

[go4saket]

Its the truth and thats the reason I never sing our so called National Anthem. If there should be a National Anthem for India, it should be :Vande Maataram"