neogopu said:NAS ....with wireless ...my choice....
entrana said:jesus christ i just told u benchmarkings are bullcrap. look at real live game tests. o ya look at those beautiful framerates that are crappy in hd2600. when u get that graphic card ur not gonna use it for benchmarking are u ? of course not ur gonna get gaming . and who gives a **** about dx10 dude u dont even have vista for gods sake!! why are u thinking about something u dont have. and even if u did have dx10 8600gt is still better
entrana said:trust me as far as i know , drivers dont make a difference because its the architecture thats the problem
entrana said:and who gives a **** about dx10 dude u dont even have vista for gods sake!! why are u thinking about something u dont have. and even if u did have dx10 8600gt is still better
keith_j_snyder2 said:I wanna correct u this time. Drivers are the one which unlocks teh barriers of the hardware. They are just like the BIOS where BIOS is itself a driver.
Remember the old X1900 series wasn't able to do HDR+AA simultaneously but with the new drivers they actually did.
u said that there in no way that we (I) be using Vista. That means DX10 too.
So also there is no point of buying a DX10 card now days, right?
Then does that means that one should opt for 7900 or X1900 instead of 8600GT and HD 2600XT?
janitha said:I think the following link from tomshardware will clarify your statement.
*www.tgdaily.com/content/view/34344/135/