Varunnagwekar
Semi-Geek
Hi,
I'm about to buy a new set of processor, mobo and ram tomorrow (From Lamington, Mumbai). I have been reading and following the advice over this forum for around one month. It seems i5 2500K is a favorite pick among many people over here. So, I had locked into that one for purchase. But today, I read an article over at Tom's Hardware (link to the article is at the end).
I'll quote one part of the article
"From a raw processing standpoint the Core i5-2500K offers very little over the cheaper Core i5-2400. It does hold three distinctions, however: it's clocked a few hundred MHz higher, it comes with Intel HD 3000 graphics, and it has an unlocked CPU multiplier. The 200 MHz (300 MHz with Turbo Boost) advantage is almost insignificant, and gamers with discrete graphics cards will care little about the integrated graphics power, but the unlocked CPU multiplier is a must for overclockers using any Sandy Bridge-based CPU."
So, in summary,
1- a few MHZ doesn't matter much.
2- I already have a discreet GPU - 4870 HD
3- I probably won't overclock as I don't have proper cooling, though I have a good Cooler Master cabinet - CM 690 Advanced II.
So this makes it actually stupid to buy it for me to buy the 2500K. So, instead I buy the 2400 and save some bucks (maybe around Rs. 1,500, I don't know about the price).
So my question is, is my logic correct or is it flawed?
Thanks
Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: January 2011 : January Updates
I'm about to buy a new set of processor, mobo and ram tomorrow (From Lamington, Mumbai). I have been reading and following the advice over this forum for around one month. It seems i5 2500K is a favorite pick among many people over here. So, I had locked into that one for purchase. But today, I read an article over at Tom's Hardware (link to the article is at the end).
I'll quote one part of the article
"From a raw processing standpoint the Core i5-2500K offers very little over the cheaper Core i5-2400. It does hold three distinctions, however: it's clocked a few hundred MHz higher, it comes with Intel HD 3000 graphics, and it has an unlocked CPU multiplier. The 200 MHz (300 MHz with Turbo Boost) advantage is almost insignificant, and gamers with discrete graphics cards will care little about the integrated graphics power, but the unlocked CPU multiplier is a must for overclockers using any Sandy Bridge-based CPU."
So, in summary,
1- a few MHZ doesn't matter much.
2- I already have a discreet GPU - 4870 HD
3- I probably won't overclock as I don't have proper cooling, though I have a good Cooler Master cabinet - CM 690 Advanced II.
So this makes it actually stupid to buy it for me to buy the 2500K. So, instead I buy the 2400 and save some bucks (maybe around Rs. 1,500, I don't know about the price).
So my question is, is my logic correct or is it flawed?
Thanks
Best Gaming CPUs For The Money: January 2011 : January Updates
Last edited: