Is a sound card really needed?

Status
Not open for further replies.

gxsaurav

You gave been GXified
You can check the official web page of VIA, too bad the chipset market is ruled out there by Intel which will not use VIA Vinyl audio, thats why they are mostly available as M-Audio consumer grade sound cards.

They lack EAX etc, due to...well Creative's licensing policy. However if it comes to Music quality, playback & reproduction they are quite good. I mean, can u expect a full fledged 24bit 7.1 channel sound card for just Rs 2500
 

AcceleratorX

Youngling
gx_saurav said:
Realtek & Via Vinyal Audio anyone? Support full 24bit audio in onboard audio segment.

Realtek sucks in terms of quality.......VIA Vinyl is good, but then again there are two types in the VIA Vinyl series:

1) Via Vinyl "default" - the VT16xx codecs, pretty decent quality IMO when used with the right drivers.

2) VIA Envy24 + VT16xx - Vinyl "Gold" - This is the real deal, Auidgy-type audio quality, but unfortunately few mobos integrate Vinyl Gold.....

As far as 24-bit is concerned, you have the SoundMAX AD1986A, AD1988A/B from Analog Devices. Realtek really doesn't come into the picture here, search any good sound review on the Net and you'll see that Realtek is the least good out of these three vendors.

My earlier thought still stands, great onboard audio quality = SoundMAX.
 

The Outsider

Beneath The Eyelids
cyberboy_kerala said:
use this little player which will give better sound in the same hardware for mp3's.Adjust the eq to rock and turn off auto amp.This player is considered as the best by audophiles around the world.
*un4seen.com/

thanks mate, imo its the only thing that comes near to f2k ;)
 

ssk_the_gr8

Make Way the LORD is Here
even i will agree & say that a sound card is needed only for an extreme audiophile or for recordin quality music
for mp3's onboard is good enough
 

goobimama

 Macboy
A soundcard is known to improve the sound quality of an mp3...though creative is really crappy at that.
 
OP
pushkaraj

pushkaraj

In the zone
AcceleratorX said:
Realtek sucks in terms of quality.......VIA Vinyl is good, but then again there are two types in the VIA Vinyl series:

1) Via Vinyl "default" - the VT16xx codecs, pretty decent quality IMO when used with the right drivers.

2) VIA Envy24 + VT16xx - Vinyl "Gold" - This is the real deal, Auidgy-type audio quality, but unfortunately few mobos integrate Vinyl Gold.....

As far as 24-bit is concerned, you have the SoundMAX AD1986A, AD1988A/B from Analog Devices. Realtek really doesn't come into the picture here, search any good sound review on the Net and you'll see that Realtek is the least good out of these three vendors.

My earlier thought still stands, great onboard audio quality = SoundMAX.

wats the diff in playing an audio track at 16-bit and 24-bit. i mean if a track was recorded at 16-bit and u try to play it at 24-bit then wat will b the effect on the output. i m really :confused: or i hav got the whole concept wrong:oops:
 

Ch@0s

In the zone
pushkaraj said:
wats the diff in playing an audio track at 16-bit and 24-bit. i mean if a track was recorded at 16-bit and u try to play it at 24-bit then wat will b the effect on the output. i m really :confused: or i hav got the whole concept wrong:oops:

Upsampling to 24bit helps... especially if the DAC itself is an oversampling one (99% of DACs are oversampling). It will not be noticeable on consumer grade equipment, but with the right equipment, the difference between 16bit and 24bit upsampled version is definitely noticeable.
 
OP
pushkaraj

pushkaraj

In the zone
Ch@0s said:
Upsampling to 24bit helps... especially if the DAC itself is an oversampling one (99% of DACs are oversampling). It will not be noticeable on consumer grade equipment, but with the right equipment, the difference between 16bit and 24bit upsampled version is definitely noticeable.
@chaos, really interesting info. Thanx bro :)
 

adithyagenius

I WANT MORE FPS!!
I would spend the money meant for SB XFi Fatal1ty on processor, speakers or on anything else and use onboard HD audio. Here are the reasons

1. I have cheap speakers , the difference is not noticable. I have bose wave music system (30k and stereo) and Creative T6060 speakers (4.4k and 5.1). I didnt find any difference on exitgy vs Realtek HD audio.

2. Most the of the games out there have only EAX 1 or EAX 2 options. I have come across only Doom3 which had EAX 4 with update. But I hate doom3 and its not worth spending on sound card for 1 single game.

3. I play on 5.1 speakers and not on headphones. So no use of virtual ear for me. Virtual Ear cannot beat a real 5.1

4. Vista doesnt support hardware acceleration. So no EAX in games in vista. Creative is charging for Alchemy project which converts Direct Sound to OpenAL. Its free for Xfi series though.

5. There is a significant framerate increase (8% in F.E.A.R) in games when I disable EAX on my computer but for my friend who is have X Fi the frame rate increase is nil. But I would have countered the framerate loss by spending the money on processor etc and get much higher increase in framerate and at the same time make my other applications work faster. Also the increase in FPS is so high on my system because its the slow PentiumD 820, the first dual core processor.

6. Onboard solutions provide echo cancellation , noise suppression , environment models and equalisers. They are enough for voice chatting on msn, google etc and for playing songs. Dedicated cards are for professional quality recording etc. But they also need an investment in very good mic and speakers .. something better than causal audiophile speakers like bose . I also found the sound blaster crysalyser to be useless.

Realtek AC97 isnt good but Realtek HD Audio onboard solution is very good. It support upto EAX2 and OpenAL.
One advice I can give is stay away from sigmatel!!
Sigma Tel sucks. I advised my friends not to take motherboards with sigmatel , but they didnt listen and are repenting now.
 
Last edited:

philcom

Bedroom DJ :)
Hi all,
I'm just a new-comer here. I just want to know , is there any M-audio Delta 1010Lt sound-card User here ? And could you please share your experience regarding the performance and Price of that Sound-card ? I need to buy one soon as I'm planning to set up a budget Home-studio of my own (my dream , lol ). Hence I solicit your kind co-operation.
Thanks and regards.
 

thrash_metal

In the zone
I've Got a Audigy 2 ZS Platinum Pro .... For home recording its a very nice card .... used for vox recording on some tracks using Shure SM-58 mic , instrument recording (both analog & digital) using Digitech GnX2 , GnX 3000 , POD XT , Jackson , Kramer , Ibanez , Fender with EMG's , Dimarzios & Duncans and Yamaha keys . Tonal preserving is very nice . If you want to setup a simple home studio and u also wanna experience nice playback (watching movies etc) .. i'll recomend a card of this type to you (dunno wether audigy is available or not)
 

deathvirus_me

Wise Old Owl
adithyagenius said:
2. Most the of the games out there have only EAX 1 or EAX 2 options. I have come across only Doom3 which had EAX 4 with update. But I hate doom3 and its not worth spending on sound card for 1 single game.

Hmm , u missed out games like FEAR , Call of Duty series , Medal of Honor series , etc. etc. .. infact almost every game supports EAX now-a-days , even if it doesn't support EAX , it supports surround sound anyway ..

adithyagenius said:
4. Vista doesnt support hardware acceleration. So no EAX in games in vista. Creative is charging for Alchemy project which converts Direct Sound to OpenAL. Its free for Xfi series though.

Creative has released the Alchemy drivers for Audigy series for around 10 USD .. obviously no one will buy it , coz a guy at the creative forums already distributed the necessary files ;) ..

adithyagenius said:
5. There is a significant framerate increase (8% in F.E.A.R) in games when I disable EAX on my computer but for my friend who is have X Fi the frame rate increase is nil. But I would have countered the framerate loss by spending the money on processor etc and get much higher increase in framerate and at the same time make my other applications work faster. Also the increase in FPS is so high on my system because its the slow PentiumD 820, the first dual core processor.

Huh didn't catch u on this one ... !!!

adithyagenius said:
Onboard solutions provide echo cancellation , noise suppression , environment models and equalisers. They are enough for voice chatting on msn, google etc and for playing songs. Dedicated cards are for professional quality recording etc. But they also need an investment in very good mic and speakers .. something better than causal audiophile speakers like bose . I also found the sound blaster crysalyser to be useless.

Maybe ur the first one to feel so :rolleyes:

adithyagenius said:
Realtek AC97 isnt good but Realtek HD Audio onboard solution is very good. It support upto EAX2 and OpenAL.
One advice I can give is stay away from sigmatel!!
Sigma Tel sucks. I advised my friends not to take motherboards with sigmatel , but they didnt listen and are repenting now.

Have u ever noticed the increase in CPU Utiization when using EAX2 with the Realtek adapter ??

Or maybe u should try running AudioburstFX with Winamp .

Also , try running Rightmark 3D Sound , and check the CPU usage ..
 

philcom

Bedroom DJ :)
thrash_metal said:
I've Got a Audigy 2 ZS Platinum Pro .... For home recording its a very nice card .... used for vox recording on some tracks using Shure SM-58 mic , instrument recording (both analog & digital) using Digitech GnX2 , GnX 3000 , POD XT , Jackson , Kramer , Ibanez , Fender with EMG's , Dimarzios & Duncans and Yamaha keys . Tonal preserving is very nice . If you want to setup a simple home studio and u also wanna experience nice playback (watching movies etc) .. i'll recomend a card of this type to you (dunno wether audigy is available or not)

Thank you very much brother, I have just checked out the review of Audigy 2 ZS Platinum Pro as per your suggestion and I'm highly impressed with it when I found the Resolution and S/N ratio , low latency Asio support and all that of the card. Really it must be a great performer !

And could you please clarify the following if it is possible?

1. As I insist on Multichannel Live recording -( I have done a pretty good amount of room-treatment beforehand ) say for instance,my requirement is 2 voice channels, 2 Guitars, 1 Keyboard , 1 Midi Drumkit, 1 Octapad --will audigy platinum pro serve my purpose ? ( How many channels can you be able to record simultaneously ? Does it consist of Six Simultaneous Inputs ? )

2. I am glad to know that you are also an SM-58 user. Very nice ! Can I hook it up directly with the Break-out Box/ Hub/interface provided with this card ? If so how is the quality/SN ratio of the built-in dynamic mic pre-amplifier of the card ?

3.Do I need to insert a 1394 firewire card in the PCI slot prior to installation of the card ?

4.Can you please post the rear /alternate view of the I/O interface or your audio setup rig over here so that I might have a fairly comprehensive idea?

5. Does the Package contain Midi cables ?

Last but not the least, thank you once again for your earliest and kind response.
 
OP
pushkaraj

pushkaraj

In the zone
Is that the only difference :confused: Well, then it's good that i have installed the realtek hd audio drivers :grin: Thanx bro :)
 

Zeeshan Quireshi

C# Be Sharp !
A soundacrd is needed mostly when u need to do heavy Duty sound crnching(my term :D) like while using FL Studio(especially v7) or SOundforge , then a powerful sound card becomes a necessity , otherwise for normal listening Onboard audio on most modern boards if enuf .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom