RaMpAgEr^GodZ
Broken In
First test of a Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge processor
Thu, 2012-02-23 - Leonidas
As usual haunt in the Far East, weeks before the launch about new processors, this time, the Chinese MyDrivers get hold of the Core i7-3770K, the flagship of Intel's upcoming Ivy Bridge Architecture and send them through a complete CPU test . The Ivy Bridge processor was compared against a Core i7-2600K from the Sandy Bridge series, which takes up but with 100 MHz lower nominal clock and also 100 MHz less Turbo Mode clock - the better comparison model to the Core i7-3770K would be here the same clock Core i7-2700K have been. Since the clock rate difference but only accounts for a maximum of 3 percent (which should provide an average of 2 percent difference in performance) , these processors can still compare quite reasonable.
Source: MyDrivers Core i7-3820
(Sandy Bridge E, 3.6 GHz) Core i7-2600K
(Sandy Bridge, 3.4 GHz) Core i7-3770K
(Ivy Bridge, 3.5 GHz)
3DMark Vantage (CPU) 24 387 23 203 26 527
3DMark11 (CPU) 9588 8756 9944
3DSMax 543 sec 551 sec 507 sec
CineBench 6.98 6.88 7.61
Fritz Chess 13 422 12 810 14 005
MediaCoder 149 sec 155 sec 140 sec
SuperPI (1M) 9.61 sec 10.655 sec 9.844 sec
wPrime (32M) 7.783 sec 7.987 sec 7.488 sec
Performance Index 105.0% 100% 110.3%
It made the Ivy Bridge model, a surprisingly good result with a 10.3 percent higher performance than the 3.0 percent slower taktendem Sandy Bridge model - this indicates a (in the appropriate benchmarks) by as much as 7-8 percent higher per / MHz performance of Ivy Bridge. Once added many general tests, such as by zip programs (often bandwidth-or interface-limited) or something like PCMark showing mostly only fairly small performance fluctuations, it could also be an increase in Pro / MHz performance of only about 5 percent will be determined - but then it depends just on the benchmark portfolio and by whether they are intentionally damaging CPU benchmarks out looking or just takes a wider benchmark for the field hands. When it comes to pure CPU performance, rather they are likely to fall 7-8 percent per / MHz advantage - is still interesting, if you can find this value in (CPU limited) gaming benchmarks.
Source : @*www.3dcenter.org/news/erster-test-eines-core-i7-3770k-ivy-bridge-prozessors
Thu, 2012-02-23 - Leonidas
As usual haunt in the Far East, weeks before the launch about new processors, this time, the Chinese MyDrivers get hold of the Core i7-3770K, the flagship of Intel's upcoming Ivy Bridge Architecture and send them through a complete CPU test . The Ivy Bridge processor was compared against a Core i7-2600K from the Sandy Bridge series, which takes up but with 100 MHz lower nominal clock and also 100 MHz less Turbo Mode clock - the better comparison model to the Core i7-3770K would be here the same clock Core i7-2700K have been. Since the clock rate difference but only accounts for a maximum of 3 percent (which should provide an average of 2 percent difference in performance) , these processors can still compare quite reasonable.
Source: MyDrivers Core i7-3820
(Sandy Bridge E, 3.6 GHz) Core i7-2600K
(Sandy Bridge, 3.4 GHz) Core i7-3770K
(Ivy Bridge, 3.5 GHz)
3DMark Vantage (CPU) 24 387 23 203 26 527
3DMark11 (CPU) 9588 8756 9944
3DSMax 543 sec 551 sec 507 sec
CineBench 6.98 6.88 7.61
Fritz Chess 13 422 12 810 14 005
MediaCoder 149 sec 155 sec 140 sec
SuperPI (1M) 9.61 sec 10.655 sec 9.844 sec
wPrime (32M) 7.783 sec 7.987 sec 7.488 sec
Performance Index 105.0% 100% 110.3%
It made the Ivy Bridge model, a surprisingly good result with a 10.3 percent higher performance than the 3.0 percent slower taktendem Sandy Bridge model - this indicates a (in the appropriate benchmarks) by as much as 7-8 percent higher per / MHz performance of Ivy Bridge. Once added many general tests, such as by zip programs (often bandwidth-or interface-limited) or something like PCMark showing mostly only fairly small performance fluctuations, it could also be an increase in Pro / MHz performance of only about 5 percent will be determined - but then it depends just on the benchmark portfolio and by whether they are intentionally damaging CPU benchmarks out looking or just takes a wider benchmark for the field hands. When it comes to pure CPU performance, rather they are likely to fall 7-8 percent per / MHz advantage - is still interesting, if you can find this value in (CPU limited) gaming benchmarks.
Source : @*www.3dcenter.org/news/erster-test-eines-core-i7-3770k-ivy-bridge-prozessors
Last edited: