Can i still purchase SD RAM ??

Status
Not open for further replies.

pimpom

Cyborg Agent
@ karanTh85 : The difference in price is probably due to difference in brand. In general, there's no reason why DDR333 should cost more than DDR400.

@ MHG : Too lazy to pick up the phone ? :) The price of 512MB is from my purchase 2 months ago; the price of 1GB was quoted to me by the owner yesterday.

The RAMs were sent by Speed Post. For security reasons, P.O.s in many cities (including Hyd-Secunderabad, Mumbai, Kolkata, Bangalore, etc. but not Delhi or my own state) do not accept electronic products for shipping, but the dealer put the RAMs in an ordinary envelope with some padding and probably submitted it without declaring the contents. The P.O. in Secunderabad probably would not have accepted a larger package without asking about the contents. For 3 RAM sticks with padding, they paid Rs.57.

I have a problem with shipping that will not apply to most of you other members. My state's Taxation Department has imposed some really silly regulations that makes it a real hassle to have anything shipped from another state, except those coming by Speed Post. You can use any other courier.

I made some other arrangements for the other bulkier items. I'm in the process of recruiting some MLAs in my state to try to get those stupid regulations changed.

Like pimpom said some DDR ram is tagged as DDR SDRAM, did you mean that or the old 133Mhz SDRAM is available at the price that you mentioned?

If its 133Mhz SDRAM and at those prices, then give me the shop's address and phone number immediately! I've been searching for a 512Mb or 1Gb SDRAM for so long. We bought 2 * 256 Mb 133Mhz SDRAM for a pc at work and it cost us over Rs.2000. This was in dec. 2007. If there's 512Mb of SDRAM for Rs.1300 toh mujhe toh jaise ali baba ka khazana mil gya :D
Computer Warehouse in Bangalore lists 256MB SDRAM at Rs.470 and 512MB at Rs.630, excluding 4% VAT. They don't mention the brand or the speed, so you'll have to ask them.

@MGH
Please help. *www.thinkdigit.com/forum/show...postcount=3817
I don't like dedicated threads, so I'll answer here. Quoting from that thread :
Please state the price of the cheapest available 1GB DDR1 400MHz RAM in Bangalore.
Also State BRAND NAME.
I need this to last an year. It won't be used to overclock.
I don't know the cheapest source in Bangalore, but Computer Warehouse on M.G.Road has various brands listed at around 1K for 512MB and a bit less than 2K for 1GB. I occasionally had a problem with Zion RAMs in the past, so I can't recommend them.

Would it provide a good boost from my current rig of Intel D915GLVG motherboard with GMA900 Onboard Graphics with 8MB Shared Video Memory and Intel Pentium 4 Prescott 2.66GHz without HT and 256MB DDR 400 RAM ?
You will definitely see improvement in performance even if you add just 256MB to your existing 256MB. Your computer will boot up more quickly, programs will load faster, games will run more smoothly and multitasking will be easier. You can also allocate more shared memory to graphics without crippling the rest of system performance.

However, since your motherboard does not have a graphics card slot, you are stuck with the onboard 915. Intel has never been very good at graphics.

I think I might be removing the old stick if it does not match.
Personally, I've never had a problem mixing RAMs from different sources except when run in dual-channel mode.

Would it be cheaper to go for 512+512 or 1024 ? Whats the price difference ?
Pricewise, it is almost always cheaper to use a single stick. But using two matched modules in dual-channel mode has a slight speed advantage. However, that advantage is usually only a few percent and not really noticeable except in benchmarks. So a single 1GB stick is probably better if you're on a tight budget.
 
Last edited:

gamer669

Broken In
Sory chucks,
DDR400 mhz are cheaper than 333 mhz 'cause most manufactures today make DDR2. According to facts a DDR1 may cost double of DDR. Also DDR 400 is more common than DDR 300, manufactureres make DDR300 less.I got 512 mb DDR 333 at rs. :cool:2100
 

pimpom

Cyborg Agent
Sory chucks,
DDR400 mhz are cheaper than 333 mhz 'cause most manufactures today make DDR2.
That doesn't make much sense. It would if you'd said "DDR2 is cheaper than DDR because.........."

Also DDR 400 is more common than DDR 300, manufactureres make DDR300 less.I got 512 mb DDR 333 at rs. :cool:2100
There's no DDR300 AFAIK but I'll take that as a typo :) Few, if any, manufacturers make DDR333 these days because manufacturing techniques have improved to the point where it makes little sense to make DDR333 since DDR400 is backward-compatible. There is no reason for DDR333 to cost more.

I can only guess at the reason why some shops sell DDR333 at a higher price. They are probably old stocks of what once were (past tense) premium, low-latency chips. They were probably stocked when there was still a significant price difference between DDR333 and DDR400, but many DDR333 sticks remained unsold when DDR400 prices (and memory prices in general) dropped. They are probably selling them at a higher price to gullible owners of older motherboards that support only up to 166/333 MHz FSB and mistakenly think they can use only DDR333.
 

gamer669

Broken In
Sorry for the type mistakes. Guys,DDR 333is really more costly due to it's lost use. people move to DDR2, production of DDR 333 dcreases. and cost increases due to shortage of ram sticks. So do you get it ?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom