smartygoldenfish
Broken In
i have a compaq presario pc core 2 duo windows xp+ubuntu
it had 512 mb ddr2 ram in one slot
i installed a 2gb ram ddr2 in another slot
there are 2 slots (now both filled)
also according to HP:
my ram has following characteristics
* Dual channel memory architecture
* Two 240-pin DDR2 DIMM sockets
* Supported DIMM types:
o PC2-3200 (400 MHz)
o PC2-4200 (533 MHz)
o PC2-5300 (667 MHz, runs at 533 MHz)
* Non-ECC memory only, unbuffered
* supports 1 GB DDR2 DIMMs
* Supports up to 2 GB
u can see my pc configuration at official hp site.
HOW COME WINDOWS XP SHOW THAT I HAVE 2.49 GB RAM WHILE MY PC SUPPORTS ONLY 2 GB!
AND ITS CLEARLY WRITTEN THAT MY PC SUPPORTS " 1 GB DDR2 DIMMS " DOES THAT MEAN I CANT HAVE 2 GB IN ONE SLOT! IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THOUGH MY PC IS SHOWING THIS 2.49 GB OF RAM, IT CAN ACTUALLY USE ONLY 1.49 GB RAM OR EVEN ONLY 512 MB RAM! :blink:
ALSO:
now my friends say since both rams are unequal 512 mb ram will slow down my 2 gb ram and i will not hav full performance.
i argue that 2 gb + 512 mb should give better performance then 2 gb + 0 mb
WHO IS RIGHT MY FRIENDS OR ME?
PLZ HELP
it had 512 mb ddr2 ram in one slot
i installed a 2gb ram ddr2 in another slot
there are 2 slots (now both filled)
also according to HP:
my ram has following characteristics
* Dual channel memory architecture
* Two 240-pin DDR2 DIMM sockets
* Supported DIMM types:
o PC2-3200 (400 MHz)
o PC2-4200 (533 MHz)
o PC2-5300 (667 MHz, runs at 533 MHz)
* Non-ECC memory only, unbuffered
* supports 1 GB DDR2 DIMMs
* Supports up to 2 GB
u can see my pc configuration at official hp site.
HOW COME WINDOWS XP SHOW THAT I HAVE 2.49 GB RAM WHILE MY PC SUPPORTS ONLY 2 GB!
AND ITS CLEARLY WRITTEN THAT MY PC SUPPORTS " 1 GB DDR2 DIMMS " DOES THAT MEAN I CANT HAVE 2 GB IN ONE SLOT! IS IT POSSIBLE THAT THOUGH MY PC IS SHOWING THIS 2.49 GB OF RAM, IT CAN ACTUALLY USE ONLY 1.49 GB RAM OR EVEN ONLY 512 MB RAM! :blink:
ALSO:
now my friends say since both rams are unequal 512 mb ram will slow down my 2 gb ram and i will not hav full performance.
i argue that 2 gb + 512 mb should give better performance then 2 gb + 0 mb
WHO IS RIGHT MY FRIENDS OR ME?
PLZ HELP